You don’t believe the women? Color me surprised
Yeah, I saw you said that before. But she has named all but one of the participants by name and can’t figure out whose house it was. We’re not talking about a big party kegger with friends of friends of friends and strangers showing up.
Six people.
I love the President’s press conference sympathies; “yeah I have to defend against these allegations all the time”. 
Why would anyone accept unsubstantiated allegations as fact especially when they only suddenly appear at a time like this?
Where were the accusers each of the last several times he was up for nominations?
"In response, an aide to Democrats on the Judiciary Committee reportedly unloaded on Senate Republicans: “Republicans are flailing,” the aide said, according to NBC News. "They are desperately trying to muddy the waters. … Twelve hours before the hearing they suggest two anonymous men claimed to have assaulted her. Democrats were never informed of these assertions in interviews, in violation of Senate rules.""
Fastest acting karma in history.
2 Likes
While you’re waiting on your deflection, maybe take a moment to answer my direct question.
You are about 8260 posts late to the party!
1 Like
Wasnt he awesome! He named a few Waitresses. He dint say nuting about $130K, Stormy or Cohen. It was paralyzing. I didnt want to look but I couldnt turn away!
Hardly a deflection, thisis the “one and only Kavenaugh Hearings Thread”. Are accusations part of this until they are retracted and then they become a deflection?
“Under no circumstances” will they turn over the therapist’s notes.
Since we already know the short excerpt she did try to throw out there did not match her story and she said the therapist got it wrong 
, I’m going to go out on a limb and say the rest of the therapist’s notes don’t help her case at all.
The chief question I would have about the therapist notes is if she had to “assess her memories” the way Ramirez did before she “remembered” it was Kavanaugh.
After all, before the therapy she never told anyone that Kavanaugh had attacked her, and during and after therapy she told several people.
Its like it came out of therapy.
An impossible to ignore pattern.
The hottest thread of all time just ran into a brick wall.
The loyal opposition is stunned.
Senate Judiciary Committee staffers twice interviewed a man this week who believes he, not Brett Kavanaugh, may be the man who “had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of his complaint,” an investigative report released late Wednesday revealed. Committee staff first spoke to the man Monday, then again Tuesday.
I knew it was over when Kavanaugh produced and promptly turned over his calendar diaries. He has evidence, the PhD psychiatrist has hot air.
The chances of her actually showing today are very slim.
Big Redstate Nothing. Thats not even a story. Pure fabrication
Hilarious. You don’t believe Ford, but you automatically believe two anonymous men who are willing to take the fall.
What fall? You people keep saying this isn’t a criminal investigation.
1 Like
You got a name of one of these guys? At least the women were real people. Im thinking trump is up to his old tricks. David Dennision called. lOL
Maybe. They seem real enough the Dems are calling foul. They certainly have nothing to lose by testifying. Unless they’re lying, that is. And why do you think I would have their names? That hasn’t been released to the public AFAIK.
Theres nobody there
Well who can blame her? She has an appointment with the FBI in San Francisco tomorrow over the death threats she’s been receiving. Wouldn’t want to miss that.
