One and only Kavenaugh Hearings Thread (part 1)

I don’t know who that is. They didn’t give a name. I’m looking for it online now, but nothing yet.

With how it came out and what’s been said, all of the holes in the stories and conflicts I see no reason at all to believe it.

A sexual predator as he’s being described could not have worked decades in such close contact with so many women and fooled them all.

If there were any truth to the claims why didn’t the FBI find any evidence during six extensive background checks?

Where was she during his prior nominations and hearings?

Probably John Barron.

They can’t quit caring if they never cared i the first place. I don’t think they care about the women. I think some of them do care about the allegations and the women. But This is political. No question. I just don’t get the hill and why die on it.

The majority is there. Go forth! That’s the part that’s confusing. Pick that guy Sneaky likes. Forget his name right now he is all about repealing gun laws

I have been a wrong a million times in politics and probably at least twice today but one thing i feel like i am right about… no matter what this is the wrong thing for reps to do in sn election year during the metoo movement.

I know i know just as it galvanizes the left it may also push the right to the polls but is that the risk you guys want to take when other equally qualified conservative candidates are available

Think about how prone they are to conspiracy theories. It all fits.

Sworn testimony is evidence. Your statement there is no evidence is false.

BTW, I haven’t decided on the credibility of this (mounting) evidence, so I don’t have a dog in this fight, yet.

Turns out the frequent flyer on the rape train was represented by ford’s attorney Katz a few years back.

Of all the lawyers in the whole wide world, she ends up representing two of the accusers??

There’s nothing to preclude an FBI investigation followed by committee hearings.

Explain the Rhode Island boat hero.

I’ll wait.

81 year old Bill Cosby, on his way to prison for serially drugging and sexually abusing women, says hello.

And once again.

Even when given under oath and unsubstantiated allegation is not evidence the allegation is true.

1 Like

How far back did his “extensive background checks” go? High school? College? Also, subsequent background checks only picked up from the previous one. They didn’t start over each time.

Think hard on that one.

There was a wealth of evidence that Cosby was abusing women for decades.

And none of it was public. Stop it.

They go back at least as far as HS even for a basic clearance and no, these types of background checks do not simply start where the last one ended. This isn’t an annual security review.

Connect the dots. It’s all obvious, isn’t it? Glenn Beck would be proud.

What about him? He lied and it didn’t hold up.

No, it isn’t. But multiple accusations don’t look to good. Ask Bill O’Reilly.

Crazies coming out of the woodwork. It’s not like the dimocrats can’t get people to show up saying whatever they are told to say at the push of a button.

Just look at all the people who got themselves arrested at the hearings.
The cosplay people outside the hearings.
The people storming senate offices and hallways.
The groups who show up to protest someone out having a meal.
Agitators on inauguration day.
Agitators at campaign rallies.
Rioting mobs burning cities.

There’s a pattern.

1 Like

He went from hero to zero in 3 hours. Impressive.