One and only Kavenaugh Hearings Thread (part 1)

[gooddad409]

Lots of folks can lie and pass lie detector tests. Why do you think they aren’t allowed as evidence in court.

Imo Hill lied and so is Burns.

[Vigilante]

@gooddad409

Lots of folks can lie and pass lie detector tests. Why do you think they aren’t allowed as evidence in court.

Imo Hill lied and so is Burns.

pffffftttt

[Steel-W0LF]

@reflechissez

@gooddad409

@Vigilante

Ive never been a victim of sexual assault so I dont know what that person is going through buuuttttt… … she does have a week to prepare to be bullied by a bunch of old white guys who have probably done worse… I think thats enough time to prepare. The situation or the Senators arent going to change. She just needs to put on her big girl pants and et up there and tell those Senators to ■■■■ off and that bastard tried to rape her and we all know they dont give a ■■■■■

Its a mans world Baby and Women are still second class citizens.

You want us to take her word for it no questions asked? It doesn’t work that way.

If she is unwilling to testify she is almost certainly lying. Anita Hill 2.

She’s willing to testify after an FBI investigation.

The FBI has no jurisdiction to investigate. Maybe next the excuse will be that she wants the EPA to investigate.

Both agencies are just as relevant to a 35 year old non federal crime.

[reflechissez]

@Steel-W0LF

@reflechissez

@gooddad409

@Vigilante

Ive never been a victim of sexual assault so I dont know what that person is going through buuuttttt… … she does have a week to prepare to be bullied by a bunch of old white guys who have probably done worse… I think thats enough time to prepare. The situation or the Senators arent going to change. She just needs to put on her big girl pants and et up there and tell those Senators to ■■■■ off and that bastard tried to rape her and we all know they dont give a ■■■■■

Its a mans world Baby and Women are still second class citizens.

You want us to take her word for it no questions asked? It doesn’t work that way.

If she is unwilling to testify she is almost certainly lying. Anita Hill 2.

She’s willing to testify after an FBI investigation.

The FBI has no jurisdiction to investigate. Maybe next the excuse will be that she wants the EPA to investigate.

Both agencies are just as relevant to a 35 year old non federal crime.

Somehow, they had jurisdiction during the Clarence Thomas hearings. What changed?

[Steel-W0LF]

@reflechissez

@Steel-W0LF

@reflechissez

@gooddad409

@Vigilante

Ive never been a victim of sexual assault so I dont know what that person is going through buuuttttt… … she does have a week to prepare to be bullied by a bunch of old white guys who have probably done worse… I think thats enough time to prepare. The situation or the Senators arent going to change. She just needs to put on her big girl pants and et up there and tell those Senators to ■■■■ off and that bastard tried to rape her and we all know they dont give a ■■■■■

Its a mans world Baby and Women are still second class citizens.

You want us to take her word for it no questions asked? It doesn’t work that way.

If she is unwilling to testify she is almost certainly lying. Anita Hill 2.

She’s willing to testify after an FBI investigation.

The FBI has no jurisdiction to investigate. Maybe next the excuse will be that she wants the EPA to investigate.

Both agencies are just as relevant to a 35 year old non federal crime.

Somehow, they had jurisdiction during the Clarence Thomas hearings. What changed?

She was a federal employee working for him.

[reflechissez]

@Steel-W0LF

@reflechissez

@Steel-W0LF

@reflechissez

@gooddad409

@Vigilante

Ive never been a victim of sexual assault so I dont know what that person is going through buuuttttt… … she does have a week to prepare to be bullied by a bunch of old white guys who have probably done worse… I think thats enough time to prepare. The situation or the Senators arent going to change. She just needs to put on her big girl pants and et up there and tell those Senators to ■■■■ off and that bastard tried to rape her and we all know they dont give a ■■■■■

Its a mans world Baby and Women are still second class citizens.

You want us to take her word for it no questions asked? It doesn’t work that way.

If she is unwilling to testify she is almost certainly lying. Anita Hill 2.

She’s willing to testify after an FBI investigation.

The FBI has no jurisdiction to investigate. Maybe next the excuse will be that she wants the EPA to investigate.

Both agencies are just as relevant to a 35 year old non federal crime.

Somehow, they had jurisdiction during the Clarence Thomas hearings. What changed?

She was a federal employee working for him.

Where did you read that?

[Camp]

It shouldn’t be…but it always is. LOL.

[SimplyTrying]

@reflechissez

@Snow96

I think they want to base it on the credability and testimony of the accused and the accuser. Remember it’s isn’t a trail (as libs keep pointing out in other threads).

It doesn’t have to be a “trail” in order for other people to testify. Don’t you know that we can see you?

I think they are on the wrong trail. No wonder they always get lost and confused. It should be under oath IMO so that if he lies there will be consequences. He can lie with impunity otherwise.

[zantax]

@reflechissez

@Snow96

PJ doesn’t recall anything like the alleged victim happening either.

Kavanaugh ex-classmate denies being at party in assault allegation | CNN Politics

“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”

“Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women. To safeguard my own privacy and anonymity, I respectfully request that the Committee accept this statement in response to any inquiry the Committee may have.”

It would be just great if he was under oath, wouldn’t it?

There is no probable cause to do such a thing. If I knew your name and accused you of raping me thirty years ago with no additional evidence, should the police put you under oath and question you based solely on my accusation? If you refused should you go to jail?

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@coolidge

And you shouldn’t encourage misleading allegations just to politically smear a person that doesn’t share your view point.

But in Ford’s case, I would expect she really doesn’t consult her husband. She wants her 15 minutes of fame.

There it is again. Already calling her a liar. There is no way that I would let people like you attack my wife.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@Joanne

What about the Democratic media who are spreading false stories and smears?

What about Democrats and media who are declaring him guilty without any evidence, and don’t care if they ruin his life and the life of his kids?

Does any of that count?

Not to me as I protect my wife and kids.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@Vigilante

@Joanne

The number of people she claimed were at the party.

Do you mean participants or witnesses or at the party total. Three aint a party

Three can be a party.

[Snow96]

Multiple lies and attacks on another person and it doesn’t matter as long as YOU can protect your wife and kids.

What about the other person’s wife and kids? The don’t count?

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@Snow96

Multiple lies and attacks on another person and it doesn’t matter as long as YOU can protect your wife and kids.

What about the other person’s wife and kids? The don’t count?

You should go back and read how I actually framed the post about my wife and children.

If my wife was telling the truth there is no way that I would let every Tom Dick and Harry, you guys, and every Rush and Laura Ingram tear our family apart. That was my point and it’s still my point. Zero chance.

[Snow96]

@CaughtInTheMiddle

If my wife was telling the truth there is no way that I would let every Tom ■■■■ and Harry, you guys, and every Rush and Laura Ingram tear our family apart. That was my point and it’s still my point. Zero chance.

The only way you would know for certain she was telling the truth is if you were there when it happened.

Now say it’s like this case where you weren’t there.
Your wife can’t remember how she got to the party
can’t remember who’s house it was
can’t remember how she got home
Blames the therapist for getting notes wrong instead of more faulty memory on how many were in the room/house
And doesn’t want to testify under oath until some kind of investigation is done almost 40 years later. Hope she realizes that the FIRST person the FBI will interview is her to find out how credible the story is to see what further investigation is needed.

[Eagle-Keeper]

@reflechissez

It would be just great if he was under oath, wouldn’t it?

Is the FBI the only organization or governing body that can put someone under oath?

[Eagle-Keeper]

@Snow96

And doesn’t want to testify under oath until some kind of investigation is done almost 40 years later. Hope she realizes that the FIRST person the FBI will interview is her to find out how credible the story is to see what further investigation is needed.

The logic behind her calling for an FBI investigation is completely asinine. No crime was ever reported.

[GWH]

@reflechissez

@Joanne

@DougBH

What’s the purpose? If he repeated it under oath you would just say he was lying under oath.

Of course. And has anyone considered these two men have unwittingly and involuntarily been dragged into this? They have families. Probably kids. So maybe they want nothing more to do with this than issue denials and vouch for BK’s character.

Yet the left says this is evidence they must know something or are being dishonest.

I’m sure they don’t want anything to do with this. What does that have to do with whether or not they should be called to testify?

Should she be subpoenaed?

[Call_me_Ishmael]

And the only one that is admitted now is the underage drinking by this woman. Maybe she should go to juvi court now.

[Steel-W0LF]

@reflechissez

@Steel-W0LF

@reflechissez

@Steel-W0LF

@reflechissez

@gooddad409

@Vigilante

Ive never been a victim of sexual assault so I dont know what that person is going through buuuttttt… … she does have a week to prepare to be bullied by a bunch of old white guys who have probably done worse… I think thats enough time to prepare. The situation or the Senators arent going to change. She just needs to put on her big girl pants and et up there and tell those Senators to ■■■■ off and that bastard tried to rape her and we all know they dont give a ■■■■■

Its a mans world Baby and Women are still second class citizens.

You want us to take her word for it no questions asked? It doesn’t work that way.

If she is unwilling to testify she is almost certainly lying. Anita Hill 2.

She’s willing to testify after an FBI investigation.

The FBI has no jurisdiction to investigate. Maybe next the excuse will be that she wants the EPA to investigate.

Both agencies are just as relevant to a 35 year old non federal crime.

Somehow, they had jurisdiction during the Clarence Thomas hearings. What changed?

She was a federal employee working for him.

Where did you read that?

Hill said in the October 1991 televised hearings that Thomas had sexually harassed her while he was her supervisor at the Department of Education and the EEOC.

Anita Hill

That’s why the fbi had grounds to investigate.