No you still don’t understand what I am saying. The FBI already conducted a background Investigation on Kavanaugh. All they are really doing is opening this investigation back up, and then asking him his side asking Ford her side. Does she remember names of people there, names of the home owners. Who through the party? All these things. If she can’t give them anything…then they go on from there. Close it back up…pass on reports to the White House, and the judiciary committee and let them figure it out. Now if something comes up…leads…then they FBI investigates further.
The FBI doesn’t just do Criminal Investigations…they do back ground investigations into all sorts of people.
But what exactly are they supposed to do with a nearly 40 year old accusation no matter what is said?
Hillary taught everyone how to get around that…“I dont recall” followed by… “What difference does it make”
See…She was good for something after all!
Hillary
Hillary
Who are you without her
Even if she had filed a complaint back in 1982, or whenever this incident occurred, nothing would have happened. Underage kids drinking at a party, one kid gets fresh with a girl, she thinks he may have wanted to get her clothes off, she gets away and she leaves the party.
What would happen to the boy, even if he admitted to everything she says happened?
I read her letter to Fienstien, it sounded like nothing happened.
Check it out…ask questions follow leads…and then close it out.
Most that could be done is to question the person(s) alleged to have been there when the incident was alleged to have happened, but I think there is no legitimate reason or statute to allow for that.
My wife and I had an opposed discussion about that this morning. She thinks it is necessary for an “investigation” before Ford testifies and I was of the opinion that it would be wrong to even have Ford testify at all, with or without any investigation.
That certainly doesn’t mean I think it was impossible that Kavanaugh did such a thing, not by any means, it just means the time to have brought this to the light of day was back then, not now.
I want to know. I want to know if his denials are true or not. If he’s lying…i don’t want him to be a Justice on the SCOTUS. Shouldn’t they be beyond reproach.
No human being beyond reproach, which includes all the current members of the SC.
1 Like
Even if she pressed charges then it’s likely a prosecutor wouldn’t persue it.
If SCJ’s had to be beyond reproach the court would stand empty.
How would any investigation at this time determine the truth or no of his denials or the truth or no of her accusations?
Nobody has said otherwise.
Should be, but the accuser’s lawyers aren’t having any of it. Instead they send a letter to Chuck Grassley asking him to ask the FBI to investigate. 
It’s the seriousness of the charge, dammit!
1 Like
I wish these allegations happened in a perfect vacuum with a perfectly consistent process. But it’s a helter skelter response seemingly more informed by politics than principle. Trump, Franken, Conyers, Barton, Kihuen,Franks, et al.
I understand each episode must be treated individually, but do feel a need for consistency and clarity.
In DC? Surely you must be joking. Two things Congress is well known for. Coke and hookers.
I’ve kind of changed my mind on that. The more I read and see her reactions the more I think she may have been set-up by Feinstein & Ilk.
If anyone should go to jail or suffer repercussions it is Feinstein for withholding the information. Though, I’m sure she’s covered all of her bases while leaving Ford out to dry.
Plus Feinstein is one of the Congressional elite. They play by an entirely different set of rules than we do. Illegal? Nah. Just for the peasants.
Haha! I’m becoming more naive the older I get.
1 Like
