And that person is committed to resisting Trump. She is not neutral.
Why do you suppose the dems did not bring this up during the hearings? Do you think it was because they wanted to use it as a way to delay the vote until after the mid terms? Could this be a simple political maneuver?
IMO she took a ton of convincing, up to the last minute, and still may decide to not follow through. And you have no evidence to frame her as some activist…
It’s ■■■■■■■ ridiculous. It’s not not understanding how the birth control pill works-slash-bitching about insurance covering the pill when you know damn well your wife is on it ignorant, but Jesus Christ.
It’s bad enough I already have to deal with this ■■■■ just to play video games.