Putting 250 hogs into a space that is currently used to hold 300 doesn’t sound terribly onerous to me. So the price of pork goes up 20 cents a pound or something.
The alternative is grossly overcrowded farming practices. I have never supported that and I don’t care to start now. I grew up with family type farms, several in my own family, which were just fine, with animals that were well cared for.
In a perfect world the consumer. Perfect it ain’t. I’m not a big regulator but some is necessary. Not California style, I have not defended them, so take note of that.
Actually, the voters of Calif did exactly that. They said they don’t want bacon from pigs raised a certain way.
The question now is whether they will be willing to pay for the fallout of that vote. (Or if they will be willing to forego bacon because of it. Or if the rest of the country will have to bear the cost of their personal preferences.)
Apparently the State has already twitched, if not fully blinked:
" … the state has eased the transition to the new system. It has allowed pork processed under the old rules and held in cold storage to be sold in California in 2022, which could prevent shortages for weeks or even months. "
I support happier pigs. But Californians could just refuse to buy from farmers who don’t share their sense of decency. That would put power where it belongs … in the hands of the people. Bringing in new government regulations when other solutions are available is always a bad bad idea.
The difference is - of course - one is a constitutionally protected right, explicitly written in English in the constitution and the other is a right written on a unicorn’s horn in progville.