You’ll never get a lib to condemn their own very way of life.
They need their slave-made electronics to virtue signal with, and ■■■■ any child or Muslim that dies for their comforts.
You’ll never get a lib to condemn their own very way of life.
They need their slave-made electronics to virtue signal with, and ■■■■ any child or Muslim that dies for their comforts.
File it under “Know your audience.”.
Samm:
Supreme_War_Pig:
Samm:
Supreme_War_Pig:
Okay then, moving onto your strawman.
Nobody said it was a news program. But that doesn’t matter, because it in no way obviates her admission of error.
Yet you believed it was serious. Go figure.
I never said anything about what I believed. I reported her statement, then parried your lame ass attempts at deflection.
So if you don’t believe it, why did you bother to bring it up? You’re not making sense.
Because it is something an aspiring politician did, in an obvious attempt at damage control.
Whether or not I believe she is sincere is irrelevant.
Now you’re getting it. The whole thing is irrelevant.
It was a white man’s name. But it wasn’t a “slave name.” It was an anti-slavery name. One he should have (or at least could have) been proud to bear. And he changed it to a slaver’s name …
Every time you start posting about slavery, you run head first into a ridiculous take.
It was unfortunate. Chances are like you said he really didn’t know.
Also the NOI is weird. Even other Muslims exclude them.
If only Cassius Clay was half the man Cassius Clay was, he really would’ve been THE greatest of all time.
Samm:
It was a white man’s name. But it wasn’t a “slave name.” It was an anti-slavery name. One he should have (or at least could have) been proud to bear. And he changed it to a slaver’s name …
Every time you start posting about slavery, you run head first into a ridiculous take.
There is nothing ridiculous about what I said; it’s historic fact. But it was somewhat ridiculous for Casius to shed his virulently anti-slavery name in exchange for the name of an overt slaver.
PurpnGold:
Samm:
It was a white man’s name. But it wasn’t a “slave name.” It was an anti-slavery name. One he should have (or at least could have) been proud to bear. And he changed it to a slaver’s name …
Every time you start posting about slavery, you run head first into a ridiculous take.
There is nothing ridiculous about what I said; it’s historic fact. But it was somewhat ridiculous for Casius to shed his virulently anti-slavery name in exchange for the name of an overt slaver.
What made his name anti slavery?
There is nothing ridiculous about what I said; it’s historic fact. But it was somewhat ridiculous for Casius to shed his virulently anti-slavery name in exchange for the name of an overt slaver.
And here I though everyone knew who Cassius Clay was named after. Everyone except the …
Samm:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
It was a white man’s name. But it wasn’t a “slave name.” It was an anti-slavery name. One he should have (or at least could have) been proud to bear. And he changed it to a slaver’s name …
Every time you start posting about slavery, you run head first into a ridiculous take.
There is nothing ridiculous about what I said; it’s historic fact. But it was somewhat ridiculous for Casius to shed his virulently anti-slavery name in exchange for the name of an overt slaver.
What made his name anti slavery?
His actions. Are you unfamiliar with what the man did?
Samm:
There is nothing ridiculous about what I said; it’s historic fact. But it was somewhat ridiculous for Casius to shed his virulently anti-slavery name in exchange for the name of an overt slaver.
And here I though everyone knew who Cassius Clay was named after. Everyone except the …
I don’t know if it’s selective knowledge or deliberate ignorance. But then, I guess it doesn’t matter.
SixFoot:
Samm:
There is nothing ridiculous about what I said; it’s historic fact. But it was somewhat ridiculous for Casius to shed his virulently anti-slavery name in exchange for the name of an overt slaver.
And here I though everyone knew who Cassius Clay was named after. Everyone except the …
I don’t know if it’s selective knowledge or deliberate ignorance. But then, I guess it doesn’t matter.
It does make sense though now that I’m thinking about it. Why the hell would a race baiter know these kinds of things anyway? They’re ignorant enough to be race baiters for crying out loud.
ETA: Oh, I remember now!
We did a thread about this already, and it was avoided like the plague. I know why…
It’s always seemed odd to me that Ali changed his name from a hard core southern abolitionist to the guy who’s legacy includes one of the the largest and most brutal slave trading systems in history. I forgot about how salty this guy’s language is so be warned… [The Most Gangster Politician Ever - Cassius Marcellus Clay]
PurpnGold:
Samm:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
It was a white man’s name. But it wasn’t a “slave name.” It was an anti-slavery name. One he should have (or at least could have) been proud to bear. And he changed it to a slaver’s name …
Every time you start posting about slavery, you run head first into a ridiculous take.
There is nothing ridiculous about what I said; it’s historic fact. But it was somewhat ridiculous for Casius to shed his virulently anti-slavery name in exchange for the name of an overt slaver.
What made his name anti slavery?
His actions. Are you unfamiliar with what the man did?
Sure.
How does that make “Clay” any less a “slave name”? Seems like you don’t understand the sentiment of “slave names” for some.
What he did as man. He was born into the richest slaver family in Kentucky, openly rejected it, and became famous for winning duels with pro-slavery advocates in the 1840s. Man amassed a real body count of dead slavers. Even got a bounty out on his head over the situation. He also beat pro slavers in the Kentucky assembly with a cane.
And at that time, the only good slaver was a dead slaver. So Cassius Clay is a real hero in my book.
How does that make “Clay” any less a “slave name”? Seems like you don’t understand the sentiment of “slave names” for some.
Actions are the only thing that matters. For example, Eisenhower is a German name.
What he did as man. He was born into the richest slaver family in Kentucky, openly rejected it, and became famous for winning duels with pro-slavery advocates in the 1840s. Man amassed a real body count of dead slavers. Even got a bounty out on his head over the situation. He also beat pro slavers in the Kentucky assembly with a cane.
And at that time, the only good slaver was a dead slaver. So Cassius Clay is a real hero in my book.
Not denying any of that. Great story and I am glad he was inspired by one of my abolitionist hero’s, William Garrison.
None of that makes “Clay” any less of a slave name. Meaning, Cassius Clays (the abolitionist) parents… gave Cassius Clays slave ancestors… the “Clay” name. Stripping them of their original name.
PurpnGold:
How does that make “Clay” any less a “slave name”? Seems like you don’t understand the sentiment of “slave names” for some.
Actions are the only thing that matters. For example, Eisenhower is a German name.
Sure and the actions of the “Clay” family was being slavers at the time the name was forced on Ali’s ancestors.
You’ll never get a lib to condemn their own very way of life.
They need their slave-made electronics
Bernie Sanders is one of the biggest Lib out there…He was, and is against the outsourcing of manufacturing to China.
Reaganomics is where that concept started…under the guise of cheaper stuff. Also included were dramatically increased profits for the company…that did the outsourcing.
Samm:
PurpnGold:
How does that make “Clay” any less a “slave name”? Seems like you don’t understand the sentiment of “slave names” for some.
Actions are the only thing that matters. For example, Eisenhower is a German name.
Sure and the actions of the “Clay” family was being slavers at the time the name was forced on Ali’s ancestors.
Not “the Clay family” … Cassius Clay
Look at that ignorant stank ass race bait from those slave-made addictions.
SixFoot:
You’ll never get a lib to condemn their own very way of life.
They need their slave-made electronics
Bernie Sanders is one of the biggest Lib out there…He was, and is against the outsourcing of manufacturing to China.
Reaganomics is where that concept started…under the guise of cheaper stuff. Also included were dramatically increased profits for the company…that did the outsourcing.
Bernie Sanders is a Socialist, not a lib.