would castle law apply for test tube babies?
Unless you’re a young black man and the intruder is a cop. Then you’re ■■■■ out of luck.
And this post is what is wrong with people today. People are becoming no better than animals.
Carrying a pregnancy to term comes with risks. If a woman doesn’t want to have those risks imposed on her, she can do what’s necessary to protect herself. If she doesn’t want her bodily resources taken against her will, she can do what’s necessary to protect herself.
No, it doesn’t. Please no.
“Imposed on her”.
Look at the penalty in California for drowning kittens.
Yep imposed on her.
Indeed, if she in fact does not want another human occupying her uterus, those risks are imposed on her. She has the right to self-determination and self-preservation.
By her own decisions?
Nope.
these are medical emergency type situations and are the great minority. should be case by case decisions between loved ones and drs.
without a medically risky situation, the baby will soon be out and away from her body.
the “imposition” is temporary.
so there is no reason to kill it (“terminate”).
unless for convenience, and sara silverman adulation
Why is ANY decision about pregnancy the governments business?
That’s how I feel about gun control. Once the left passes something, there’s always the next step for them. They’ll never be happy.
because of democrats wanting them to pay for healthcare
I think it’s pretty self-explanatory.
Calvin_Reagan:
If you believe abortion is murder, then you wouldn’t logically believe that it’s okay for one state to permit murder, but allow another state to criminalize it.
How dare you point out the never-ending stream of hypocritical stances by the religious right.How dare you point out the never-ending stream of hypocritical stances by the religious right.
How about the fact that one can only solve it the way that you mention is by getting a constitutional amendment passed by 37 or 38 states to make it so all unborn life is protected. Seeing that at the current and maybe no time in the near future, ain’t going to happen. It is not hypocritical to realize that, and attempt to save whatever babies you can, and try to get Roe v Wade overturned and put whatever bans, restrictions are possible. Why is it not hypocritical for people who supposedly care about children outside the womb, who did not get killed in their own mother’s womb, to promote the slaughter of innocent babies in somebody else’s womb, something that conveniently didn’t happen to them?
Hmm, so if the govt didn’t pay for abortion you would be pro-choice?
Well since no one is promoting it we don’t have to worry.
