Everyone who practices critical thinking should take this as a textbook example of how to not win an argument.
Notice how the use of expletives proceeds the (double) absolute characterization. At this point in the expression, he/she has expressed a desperate attempt at establishing a defensive position, only to follow it with not just one, but two indefensible characterizations (absolutes being the only arguments that can be scientifically classified as indefensible).
The incognizant vomit which followed is (by it’s very nature) next to impossible to contest in a reasonable manner. It is easy to be distracted by it, but there is no need go top-spinning in crazy-land, as the quickest and most decisive response is to simply ask them to support their claim that my point is “unsupportable”.
Apparently you can’t do math either considering you refuse to tell the ROR during the eight years! Oh well.
PS… just read a story that Al-qaeda is on the rise and looking for another spectacular attack. Hopefully that doesn’t happen but the rise of
Al-qaeda is on Trumps watch!
Everyone with even a mere soupçon of taste or good humor should take this as an example of insufferably pretentious ■■■■■■■■■■■■ Notice how the poster avoids the substance of the post he/she is responding to and instead, pauses to clutch his pearls, stuff his pipe with pencil shavings, and then give a vague, half-assed lecture to an empty classroom, with the kind of insight one usually associates with the drunk guy at the bar, trying to hold it together and project “seriousness” and “detachment” as he tells you how awesome Ayn Rand is.
[At that point, I discreetly move five stools away, with a graceful slide of my dry Rob Roy.]