Being a ■■■■■ has nothing to do with one’s actual nature. That’s all environment right there. 
Please pay attention. I said you have violence within you, not that you are outwardly violent. And given the right circumstances, it can come out.
I agree. We are all born with different personalities. Some tend to be more violent than others. There is no “we.”
lol. i was bullied. did not use violence to solve the problem.
there are other ways.
Allan
And most of them don’t work.
did you try them?
Allan
i befriended the ones who where bullying me. helped them with homework. invited them to my home. they met my family.
end of the bully.
still a facebook friend to this very day.
how do you think we won the cold war without shooting off a nuke at russia?
Allan
What for? My method worked.
Giving in and doing their homework is not “solving” a problem.
So I have a question, this is a real life scenario that I was a part of.
If you were dating/“going with” a girl and you are walking in the hall of your HS and her ex spots the both of you holding hands. Now, a key piece of information here is she broke up with him and started to “go with” you. He walks up with a few of his boys and looks at the two of you and says to you “you can have her, she is not a whole woman anyways”. She had cancer and had to have a total hysterectomy last year.
What would you do?
And yes, this actually happened, and sadly the cancer returned and she eventually passed in 2000.
1 Like
There is no one size fits all solution. What worked for you won’t necessarily work for others.
I too was verbally bullied. Being a peaceful nerd, I put up with it for most of my high school years. That lasted until my senior year. With one particular bully, he liked to get right up in my face. Again, I simply stood my ground and took it.
One day he made the mistake of touching me. I freaked out and slammed him against an outside wall. Needless to say, he didn’t bother me again.
1 Like
Uh oh
Iran’s existing stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium was not destroyed, however. The IAEA said last week it believes “the majority” of Iran’s stockpile is intact, and probably buried in the ruins of the three bombed facilities.
The headline does not match the story.
1 Like
Bingo!
From the article:
“We do not see anything that would give rise to the hypothesis of any substantive work going on there,” he said of Iran’s activity at the three sites.
And then you have to wonder … given the posting of the article and the spin of the headline, what’s the point of posting it? What’s the desired outcome? Another bombing run? Or just more girlish TDS?
Iran’s existing stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium was not destroyed, however. The IAEA said last week it believes “the majority” of Iran’s stockpile is intact, and probably buried in the ruins of the three bombed facilities.
They believe the uranium is in tact, but what do they say about the equipment and the facility?
Also, if the uranium is “buried in the ruins,” can it be extracted and used?
First they’ll have to sift through a literal mountain of rubble. I know a thing or two about Earth moving operations, and it’s gonna be a LOT of fun for their equipment operators going through all that granite and twisted steel. 
4 Likes
Not intact.
1 Like
Heck. We bury nuclear waste so it can’t be used.
There are people who “believe” the nuclear material is intact. Maybe it is. Maybe it isn’t. When our spy satellites see heavy equipment digging at the Iranian site, we can start being concerned.
2 Likes
