Watch Fox news.
It has been a feature of their stories all day.
Watch Laura Ingraham’s Monday show and Sean Hannity’s Monday show - both detail this and even SHOW the President saying this a year ago.
M
1 Like
uh no
10 char
You asked for a link.
I gave you my sources. I can’t help it if you don’t want to use them. Be ignorant.
M
1 Like
Wicked Fail!
Uh oh. Even Judge Napolitano believes this meeting could lead to conspiracy charges and convictions.
They went to a meeting to get something of value from the russian government.
Seems pretty cut and dry.
1 Like
It’s a fail to tell you exactly where I got the information you wanted cited???
IT IS THERE.
If you choose not to look at it that is YOUR FAILURE not mine.
M
.
If that is the case then the Clinton campaign is actually GUILTY of that, as they not only sought but actually USED information from a foreign source - both from Ukraine and also from Christopher Steele and his Russian allies.
But INFORMATION is NOT considered something of value any more than any news story is considered something of value - unless that information is WORK product - like the Steele dossier. Just being given information for free is the RIGHT of every person in this nation and no election law can ever change that, unless they amend the Constitution.
M
See post above.
Unless they PAY for it it is simply information and that is your right to hear, anytime, anyplace.
1st Amendment.
M
Perhaps you are limited in your understanding of pay.
Hillary and the DNC were generating unsupportable salacious garbage from agents in the same country and paying another foreign agent to gather it.
As for the claim it is treason that’s absolute garbage. Treason is clearly defined in the US code and our Constitution.
Making such a claim is just absolute partisan idiocy.
It’s been talked about on Fox for over a year and there’s nothing new to be added.
What information was sought and used from the Ukraine?
As for Steele, there is absolutely no evidence that any of his memos that make up the dossier were ever used by the DNC or Clinton. Steele took everything to the FBI instead of to the Clinton campaign.
That is simply false. Hence Napolitano’s concern and speculation that this meeting could amount to conspiracy which could lead to convictions for those participating and with foreknowledge of the meeting. If Trump himself knew ahead of time, then he could be in real jeopardy here. Trump Jr. is definitely at risk right now. Kushner and Manafort may be as well, depending on what they knew prior to the meeting.
Not true. Taking something of value from a foreign government for the purpose of winning an election is illegal. You don’t have to pay for it to be illegal.
On what are you basing that on in claiming he never turned any of it over to the DNC or Clintons?
If that’s true he owes them millions.
On all of the evidence and available information in the public sphere regarding everything we know about Steele and the dossier and the timeline of him providing it to the FBI. Additionally, the absence of any evidence that shows the memos were ever provided to the DNC or Clinton by Fusion.
If you have evidence that proves otherwise, I’d love to see it. I’ve followed this incredibly closely and have spent hundreds of hours over the course of months and months researching all of this.
I’ve seen absolutely nothing supporting the contention he never turned it over to his employers.
Can you provide a link?
Of course he turned it over to his employers. Fusion GPS was his employer.
And if they didn’t turn the information over to HRC and the DNC they are in breech of contract since they paid for the services.
I highly doubt you are familiar with the specifics of the contract, but in case you are, please feel free to let us know which provision Fusion was in breach of.
Regardless, they turned it over to Perkins Coie, the company they contracted with.
