That’s as good a guess as any. Hell, nobody really knows all the details yet.
Probably uses a 7 iron instead of a 6.
1 Like
Which makes wild daily speculation possible. People are burned out or tuned out by now.
Trump’s tweets?
Yeah. I bet that’s wearing his supporters out.
I’m sure Trump Republicans are. Everyone else is just patiently waiting for the results.
What offer from the Russian government did anyone take on that? Zero.
Trump outright admitted that his son got an offer from representatives of the Russian government and took them up on it.
If you have a problem with dishonesty, you must have a problem with Jr. lying about this meeting and Sr. lying about his involvement with writing Jr’s lies.
1 Like
And just to be clear, these two things are fundamentally different -
Hillary clinton paid a law firm for opposition research.
Trump’s team took a meeting directly with representatives of the russians government to talk about information they had that would help their campaign.
Also, the dossier has been looked at dozens of times by all sorts of people. and there is no evidence of wrong doing. To say we aren’t hearing about HRC and the dossier or it’s not being looked into is a lie.
So your main objection is, Trump didn’t hire a law firm to do his dirty work for him like Hillary did?
You don’t see a difference between hiring a firm to do Op. research, and negotiating with a foreign government to get op. research?
Nah- my main objection is that the Trump team literally agreed to sit down with a Kremlin operative to get information on their political opponent “as part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”
It would have been a lot more interesting of a campaign had some hostile nation stolen Don Jr’s emails so we had been able to hear about this meeting prior to the election.
They are desperate to conflate the two. But the proof is in the pudding. Trump’s own DOJ would not order an investigation because:
Sessions said “it would take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a special counsel.”
We were having a discussion and then you became “triggered”. Have a nice day.
Beyond an extremely weak deniability that only the feeble would find plausible? No.
You should be investigated for that comment.
Trump’s DOJ would disagree.
Why would that be?
Your first sentence is hilarious. The rest is just BS. For one, the Mueller investigation has brought results. And there’s more to come.
