been watching too many fairy tales in the past 3 years.
Allan
My favorite part of absentee mail in voting is that people who might be intimidated by the people working the polls can do their civic duty in the privacy of their own homes.
My other favorite things are that people who are caretakers, have health issues, who don’t have reliable transportation, who work long and erratic hours, or are otherwise unassured of having free unencumbered time on that one day are given plenty of time to plan in advance to take care of their civic duty.
And, many people do absentee voting so that they can work the polls in some capacity on election day.
Win win!
So, everyone mentioned HERE is lying and offering “fairy tales”? The smart money is on them and not on the ■■■■■■■■ you post in this forum.
1 Like
Fed Judge stops Abrams and Biden’s DOJ from interfering in election integrity process using “lawfare”.
.
As we are learning, the integrity of our election process has not only been attacked in New York, but has likewise been attacked in Georgia using what is known as “lawfare”
From the article:
Catherine Engelbrecht, Founder of True the Vote, “hailed the ruling as a vindication against lawfare and intimidation”.
CLICK HERE for Judge’s order in favor of Defendants “True the Vote” and against Stacey Abrams and Biden’s DOJ.
Keep in mind Stacey Abrams and Biden’s DOJ attempted to use the courts to stop “True the Vote”, an election integrity group, from challenging the eligibility of a number of Georgia voters. This is what the current Democrat Leadership is about . . . using every means possible to prevent and stop any inquiries or investigations into the integrity of our election process, and that includes shortstopping legitimate discussions concerning the fact that mail-in ballot voting is extremely vulnerable to vote stealing and government orchestrated election fraud.
JWK
The 2024 election is almost here. If no-excuse mail-in voting is not curtailed, our election process will be no better than those held in China, Russia or Cuba, where there is one party authoritarian rule.
1 Like
from the NYT 1-2-2024
“The decision was relatively narrow, applying only to Judge Jones’s district in northern Georgia, and will do little to change the status quo: Right-wing election groups have already tried to help bring thousands of challenges to voter registrations in states across the country.”
Changes very little.
Allan
The New York Times?
JWK
Today’s mainstream media outlets ___ ProPublica, Media Matters, MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, in addition to Hollywood, Facebook, Google, Apple, Politico, Snopes, Fact Check… ETC., and countless Yellow Journalists who are who are very un-American ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the old Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
what facts did the times miss.
the ruling is narrow and only effects northern georgia.
Allan
The Judge’s RULING was a big blow to the scumbag democrat leadership’s use of lawfare to win elections and concluded:
For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that there has not been any violation of Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act by any of the named Defendants in this case. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of January, 2024.
The democrat party leadership is known for always accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
1 Like
it was a narrow ruling only covering North Georgia.
Allan
The Judge’s RULING was a big blow to the scumbag democrat leadership’s use of lawfare to win elections in Georgia.
Striking down frivolous lawsuits is a healthy step forward in cleaning up our election process.
JWK
The democrat party leadership is known for always accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
2 Likes
only in north georgia.
rest of the nation status quo and dont have to abide by this judges ruling.
Allan
Are you now admitting the democrat leadership’s plan is to engage in “lawfare”, frivolous lawsuits and judge shopping, to keep intact no-excuse mail-in ballot voting where it is used, and to expand this fraud prone method of voting?
2 Likes
nothing of the sort. only that that ruling only covers north georgia and not the rest of the country.
that fact cannot be disputed.
narrow ruling. status quo for the rest of the country.
Allan
All of which you spew above is irrelevant to the fact the Judge’s RULING was a big blow to the scumbag democrat leadership’s use of lawfare to win elections in Georgia.
And the judge, in striking down that frivolous lawsuit, is a healthy step forward in cleaning up the corrupted election process in Georgia.
JWK
The 2024 election is almost here. If no-excuse mail-in voting is not curtailed, our election process will be no better than those held in China, Russia or Cuba, where there is one party authoritarian rule.
1 Like
only northern Georgia.
Narrow ruling.
Allan
I accept you conceding by your silence, that the Judge’s RULING was a big blow to the scumbag democrat leadership’s use of lawfare to win elections in Georgia.
So, getting back to the subject of the thread, let us review a summary of the obvious security deficiencies with mail-in ballot voting.
-
There is a loss of chain of custody from the time a mail-in ballot is received by a theoretically legitimate recipient of a mail-in ballot, to the time when that mail-in ballot is counted.
-
There is no practical way to scrutinize a mail-in ballot when counted, to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot.
-
Any election officer with a desire to perpetrate election fraud and has access to various state data bases containing personal information on in-state residents, i.e., driver’s license, voter rolls, tax returns, etc., can easily fabricate a few thousand fraudulent mail-in ballots per urban voting district [meaning large populous district] using that information, fill them out and introduce them into the system [e.g. drop boxes or mail boxes] with a slim to no chance of these ballots ever being detected when they are counted.
-
It is as easy as pie for a person wanting to steal votes, to obtain a supply of mail-in ballots, an example being Abdul Rahman’s method
JWK
The troubling truth with allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.
1 Like
northern georgia only.
narrow ruling.
Allan
Oh, look the more truth coming out about organized fraud…
NEW EVIDENCE REVEALED… GBI Strategies Employee Who Turned In Fraudulent Muskegon Voter Registrations Gives STUNNING Interview — Lists Urban Cities Where Organization Operates In Michigan and Nationwide [VIDEO]
“hey confirmed for us that the details of the police report were accurate but explained there was much more to this story than ONE city clerk receiving boxes of suspicious voter registrations; in fact, clerks across the state of Michigan received boxes and priority mail envelopes stuffed with registrations, many of them with the same signatures, the same last four numbers of their social security number, fake names and fake addresses.”
1 Like
Here is another article related to Michigan election fraud.
Appeals court reinstates 4 election fraud charges against Southfield clerk
LANSING – The Michigan Court of Appeals has reinstated four charges related to forging or falsifying election records against the Southfield city clerk, after four of the six charges she faced were dismissed by a lower court judge in April.
And a review of evidence that is part of the three-judge panel’s opinion sheds light on a possible motive for Clerk Sherikia Lavette Hawkins to alter information related to 193 absentee ballots after the Nov. 6, 2018 election.
And here is a later story:
Southfield clerk Sherikia Hawkins pleads to 1 crime; 5 charges dropped
And, here is the end story:
2 Likes
I see you are still in self-denial.
JWK
The troubling truth with allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.
