My impression is that most of the lying is lying by omission. Media simply ignore some stories, and in stories that they report they frequently leave out relevant details. In addition the language that they use changes the impression created by the story.
On some level these problems are inevitable, but the skewed reporting seems to have gotten far worse in recent years. It is important to get information from a range of sources with different viewpoints to have a complete picture.
Because the first story I saw in this week’s report- the Jessica Doty Whittaker story…they make it look like only a couple “left leaning” news organizations covered it.
Which is decidedly not true.
I only did a quick perusal…but would love for their methodology to be published somewhere.
Yes it can affect people with different viewpoints, but the default is to live a news bubble that is dominated by left-wing media.
For example, if you go to an airport or a gym you are likely to see CNN. If you have an I-phone, the news app is skewed to the left. If you prefer news from the right, then you have to actively avoid the pervasive news source that are skewed left in order to live a real news bubble.
On the other hand, the default is to live in a bubble dominated by news from the left. You have to actively seek out alterative viewpoints to get out of the bubble.
Cable news channels are there to make money. There are good journalists there, but they are beholding the the clicks and ad dollars more so than the news.
There are exceptions.
Anyone who gets the news from only cable news, is not well informed.
Read the paper.,
Read a magazine.
Democracy is not a spectator sport, one has always had to put a little effort into being informed.