This is not so far fetched…in reality all you need to do to ruin someone is have someone make up an accusation of sexual assault. In 2018 the woman is to be believed regardless of the truth, regardless of the situation, and regardless of the absence of any real proof. This is something I would be worried about if I were Mueller.
All of them is the attempt. Mueller is attacking rep activists and thus all reps as dishonest, 6 days out…
I guess he thought the trails would last longer, but they didn’t… And he got nothing from the indictments and trials for this October, so he went with this is my guess… Pretty desperate.
Republican arguments are always so ■■■■■■■ weak that all any of you ever do is create these completely ■■■■■■■■ narratives and then rail against them like a bunch of morons. Talk about SAD.
The activist is not running for office. Are you really saying that nobody associated with politics whatsoever can be criminally investigated during election season?
You mean your stupid question? Sure. Mueller hired a cut out to pose as Jack Burkman to offer to pay a woman to falsely accuse Mueller of sexual assault. Mueller also told the cut out to pick this particular woman knowing she would spill the beans. How’s that for an answer?
If we go into the way, way back machine, we also discover that Burkman, before his campaign to combat the great gay shower menace by banning gay men from the NFL, and before his detective work on the Seth Rich story, we find this former lobbyist for Family Research Council was . . . . wait for it . . . a paid-up member on the DC Madame’s list back in 2007. Oooh. A genuine whoremonger. Awesome.