If this was happening to a democrat, it wouldn’t have even made it to this board.
If this was happening to a democrat, it wouldn’t have even made it to this board.
That’s just silly. There are plenty of Republicans who have posting privileges here in Hannity-Land.
Maybe you wouldn’t have made an effort to discuss the topic if it was a Democrat, but other people would have.
LOL what a stupid comment. If a Democrat scandal doesn’t make it on this board then its your fault and the fault of other so called Conservatives for failing to creating a thread.
Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema:Glad to see we’re nearing the acceptance phase. We didn’t get our collusion, but at least we made a few bucks.
We should turn this into a regular thing for every politician.
“(Redacted) meeting with Kilimnik” in the Manafort sentencing memo should make all of those who are saying “No Collusion” give pause.
What is criminal about it?
We don’t know really what the meeting entailed.
But given that Kilimnik is GRU and was the contact between Manafort and Derispaska AND we know that Manfort was using his position in the Trump campaign to attempt to repay the dept owed to him by changing the policy towards Russia within the GOP… then the “(Redacted meeting with Kilimnik” more than likely means that it doesnt start and stop with Manafort.
It could be meaningless… likely it is not.
That is why it should give pause.
I thought you didn’t go in for conspiracy theories.
It isn’t a conspiracy theory.
It is what is in the sentencing memo of Manafort.
It is going on what we know between the official filings and what is being reported in the news.
There is still a chance that there was no coordination between people in the Trump campaign and a Russian interests… but with every new piece of information, that chance is getting smaller and smaller.
It should give pause.
Interesting.
I was willing to concede that the real illegality between contacts of the Trump Campaign began and ended with Manafort. Even though there is evidence suggesting that there was more than that… I wouldn’t have been too surprised if that was it.
After “(Redacted) meeeting with Kilimnik” that means that there was contact outside of Manafort. That should be worrying to those who keep saying “No Collusion” it isn’t yet slam dunk… but it should give pause.
You should read the sentencing memos.
Especially Manafort’s
They are highly informative.
You assume that I haven’t. Reading and reading into are two very different things.
Fair enough. But if this was happening to a Democrat… I think that you and I would find more agreement.
If this was happening to a democrat, it wouldn’t have even made it to this board.
Wait… what?
The same board that spent an enormous amount of time of people tending their clothes in anger over Common being invited to the White House?
That board?
Very silly.
I cam think of 10 posters on this board who would have made a thread on it. Ones a mod…
It’s a very good assumption you didnt…
Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema:Glad to see we’re nearing the acceptance phase. We didn’t get our collusion, but at least we made a few bucks.
We should turn this into a regular thing for every politician.
“(Redacted) meeting with Kilimnik” in the Manafort sentencing memo should make all of those who are saying “No Collusion” give pause.
What is criminal about it?
We don’t know really what the meeting entailed.
But given that Kilimnik is GRU and was the contact between Manafort and Derispaska AND we know that Manfort was using his position in the Trump campaign to attempt to repay the dept owed to him by changing the policy towards Russia within the GOP… then the “(Redacted meeting with Kilimnik” more than likely means that it doesnt start and stop with Manafort.
It could be meaningless… likely it is not.
That is why it should give pause.
I thought you didn’t go in for conspiracy theories.
It isn’t a conspiracy theory.
It is what is in the sentencing memo of Manafort.
It is going on what we know between the official filings and what is being reported in the news.
There is still a chance that there was no coordination between people in the Trump campaign and a Russian interests… but with every new piece of information, that chance is getting smaller and smaller.
It should give pause.
Interesting.
I was willing to concede that the real illegality between contacts of the Trump Campaign began and ended with Manafort. Even though there is evidence suggesting that there was more than that… I wouldn’t have been too surprised if that was it.
After “(Redacted) meeeting with Kilimnik” that means that there was contact outside of Manafort. That should be worrying to those who keep saying “No Collusion” it isn’t yet slam dunk… but it should give pause.
You should read the sentencing memos.
Especially Manafort’s
They are highly informative.
You assume that I haven’t. Reading and reading into are two very different things.
Fair enough. But if this was happening to a Democrat… I think that you and I would find more agreement.
If this was happening to a democrat, it wouldn’t have even made it to this board.
Wait… what?
The same board that spent an enormous amount of time of people tending their clothes in anger over Common being invited to the White House?
That board?
Very silly.
I said “this” board.
Just wait till he ends the irs you libs are gonna cry
You’re gonna cry when the Trump family gets charged.
This board which has QAnon theories on it and discussion about Uranium One?
The thing is that the GOP has been in charge for two years. The Trump Administration has proven to be more of a morass of corruption than we have not seen in my lifetime at least.
I know that the CEC and the people who abide by their words were all ready in 2016 to have two years of Clinton scandal mongering only to have it all snatched away and replaced with near daily scandals of the Trump administration… I know it must be exhausting and wearing making excuses all the time as to why the Presidency resembles more of a clown car on fire going over a cliff than a functioning Branch of our government mandated by the Constitution.
The off ramp that takes one back to reality away from crazy town is available at any time.
All one had to do it have a little introspection and take it.
LOL what a stupid comment. If a Democrat scandal doesn’t make it on this board then its your fault and the fault of other so called Conservatives for failing to creating a thread.
Remembering all the stupid threads about Obama on this board. Those were the days, as the song goes.
Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema:Glad to see we’re nearing the acceptance phase. We didn’t get our collusion, but at least we made a few bucks.
We should turn this into a regular thing for every politician.
“(Redacted) meeting with Kilimnik” in the Manafort sentencing memo should make all of those who are saying “No Collusion” give pause.
What is criminal about it?
We don’t know really what the meeting entailed.
But given that Kilimnik is GRU and was the contact between Manafort and Derispaska AND we know that Manfort was using his position in the Trump campaign to attempt to repay the dept owed to him by changing the policy towards Russia within the GOP… then the “(Redacted meeting with Kilimnik” more than likely means that it doesnt start and stop with Manafort.
It could be meaningless… likely it is not.
That is why it should give pause.
I thought you didn’t go in for conspiracy theories.
It isn’t a conspiracy theory.
It is what is in the sentencing memo of Manafort.
It is going on what we know between the official filings and what is being reported in the news.
There is still a chance that there was no coordination between people in the Trump campaign and a Russian interests… but with every new piece of information, that chance is getting smaller and smaller.
It should give pause.
Interesting.
I was willing to concede that the real illegality between contacts of the Trump Campaign began and ended with Manafort. Even though there is evidence suggesting that there was more than that… I wouldn’t have been too surprised if that was it.
After “(Redacted) meeeting with Kilimnik” that means that there was contact outside of Manafort. That should be worrying to those who keep saying “No Collusion” it isn’t yet slam dunk… but it should give pause.
You should read the sentencing memos.
Especially Manafort’s
They are highly informative.
You assume that I haven’t. Reading and reading into are two very different things.
Fair enough. But if this was happening to a Democrat… I think that you and I would find more agreement.
If this was happening to a democrat, it wouldn’t have even made it to this board.
Wait… what?
The same board that spent an enormous amount of time of people tending their clothes in anger over Common being invited to the White House?
That board?
Very silly.
I said “this” board.
This board which has QAnon theories on it and discussion about Uranium One?
The thing is that the GOP has been in charge for two years. The Trump Administration has proven to be more of a morass of corruption than we have not seen in my lifetime at least.
I know that the CEC and the people who abide by their words were all ready in 2016 to have two years of Clinton scandal mongering only to have it all snatched away and replaced with near daily scandals of the Trump administration… I know it must be exhausting and wearing making excuses all the time as to why the Presidency resembles more of a clown car on fire going over a cliff than a functioning Branch of our government mandated by the Constitution.
The off ramp that takes one back to reality away from crazy town is available at any time.
All one had to do it have a little introspection and take it.
You should take it.
Sadly… the way things are going… it is going to a tough couple of years coming up.
The chance is always there to realize that you have been lied to and are defending a con man… and for what?
Sadly… the way things are going… it is going to a tough couple of years coming up.
The chance is always there to realize that you have been lied to and are defending a con man… and for what?
How is it that any time someone disagrees with one of you it’s “defending” Trump? My comment wasn’t about him, but everything is about him to you guys.
Hopefully you’ll reach the acceptance stage sooner rather than later. Either way, I think this new precedent is great. Colonoscopies for every candidate and anyone who that candidate ever looked at.
Jezcoe:Sadly… the way things are going… it is going to a tough couple of years coming up.
The chance is always there to realize that you have been lied to and are defending a con man… and for what?
How is it that any time someone disagrees with one of you it’s “defending” Trump? My comment wasn’t about him, but everything is about him to you guys.
Hopefully you’ll reach the acceptance stage sooner rather than later. Either way, I think this new precedent is great. Colonoscopies for every candidate and anyone who that candidate ever looked at.
Or at the very least, uphold the tradition of voluntarily releasing their tax returns.
Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe:Sadly… the way things are going… it is going to a tough couple of years coming up.
The chance is always there to realize that you have been lied to and are defending a con man… and for what?
How is it that any time someone disagrees with one of you it’s “defending” Trump? My comment wasn’t about him, but everything is about him to you guys.
Hopefully you’ll reach the acceptance stage sooner rather than later. Either way, I think this new precedent is great. Colonoscopies for every candidate and anyone who that candidate ever looked at.
Or at the very least, uphold the tradition of voluntarily releasing their tax returns.
Next talking point, please.
Jezcoe: Girl_from_Ipanema: Jezcoe:Sadly… the way things are going… it is going to a tough couple of years coming up.
The chance is always there to realize that you have been lied to and are defending a con man… and for what?
How is it that any time someone disagrees with one of you it’s “defending” Trump? My comment wasn’t about him, but everything is about him to you guys.
Hopefully you’ll reach the acceptance stage sooner rather than later. Either way, I think this new precedent is great. Colonoscopies for every candidate and anyone who that candidate ever looked at.
Or at the very least, uphold the tradition of voluntarily releasing their tax returns.
Next talking point, please.
Wait? How is that a talking point? You are proposing deep dives into candidates and their associates and all I am saying that at the very least a tradition should be upheld.
Backtracking now?
This is a good primer on all the ties to Russia the Trump campaign and transition had starting in Fall of 2015.
This is a good primer on all the ties to Russia the Trump campaign and transition had starting in Fall of 2015.
I don’t need to read all of that to know that Hillary colluded with Russia to win the election.
I’m hoping someone will be along any minute now to post a primer on all of Hillary’s Russian connections. I just hope it has pictures for those of us having difficulty following that storyline.
This is a good primer on all the ties to Russia the Trump campaign and transition had starting in Fall of 2015.
Trying to educate these Trumpettes is a waste of time. They’ll find out soon enough. If they want to see the world through rose-colored glasses, that’s their problem.