He’s a young, intelligent mostly libertarian who had an open mind they tried to fill with crap. He’s working it out.
He’s studying law.
Ah got it.
OK might have have under estimated him…or either that he like screwing with me in the past.
I was hoping it was intentional.
Yeah, I did too. But he grows on you.
Like a fungus.
I think it was the correct decision, according to the law.
But the law is a whole different animal than ethics or morals.
Certainly not how I’d describe myself, but thanks I guess.
Ooooh! Goody! Why?
How would you describe yourself?
I generally don’t.
I guess you could call me a postmodernist.
But laws are based on ethics are they not? And ethics are based on individual morality that migrated into public realm.
And MAS*H was a TV show based on a movie that was based on a book.
It’s a phase, you’ll grow out of it.
It wasn’t a valid question?
It was a valid question. My answer was valid, too.
Have you ever seen the movie? It bears little relation to the TV show. The book bears little resemblance to the movie or TV show as well.
They are all different things, even though they are, in a sense, based on each other.
Anything’s possible.
I disagree completely.
With what?
My comparative opinion on the MASH movie, book and TV show?
The movie was exponentially better than the show ever was, and at least twice as good as the book.
With this:
They are all different things, even though they are, in a sense, based on each other.
Good night.
And you wonder why I don’t take your serious.
Faced with difficult question that goes against your belief structure you deflect.
