I will admit I didn’t follow this case, but from the description in the article, I don’t think Mr. Noor’s actions evinc[ed] a depraved mind, without regard for human life.
But I disagree with the breadth of the ruling, because I absolutely believe that in general, actions directed specifically at an individual can evince such a depraved mind.
The classic example of “depraved heart” murder is someone throwing a barbell off an overpass. An act that while not directly intending to kill someone, requires a mens rea of utter disdain and disregard for human life.
I agree that it was a bad shoot. But I don’t think Noor’s actions meet the threshold of depraved heart murder.
Okay, but here’s my thing: is up to 10 years a sufficient sentence for a cop, under the color of authority, for killing an unarmed, bare foot person?