DougBH
October 15, 2019, 10:47pm
108
Well, apparently it goes against free speech and the Constitution to allow someone to talk about religion at a University.Apparently some there believe a non secularist should not be allowed to speak at a university.
She said that Barr speaking in Notre Dame is unconstitutional ?
Professor Feldman wrote in response to Barr’s speech. “Incredible that a law school would have such a legal know-nothing to speak,” she added.
Railing against pop culture… a tale as old as time
Quickest way to become a bitter old dried up husk of a human being.
as opposed to what, retirees watching billie eilish videos
Who the ■■■■ is Billie Eilish?
only a “bitter old dried up husk of a human being” wouldn’t know
1 Like
Jezcoe
October 15, 2019, 11:02pm
111
Railing against pop culture… a tale as old as time
Quickest way to become a bitter old dried up husk of a human being.
as opposed to what, retirees watching billie eilish videos
Who the ■■■■ is Billie Eilish?
only a “bitter old dried up husk of a human being” wouldn’t know
I am not complaining about her existence… I just don’t know who she is.
That is the difference.
W_and_C
October 15, 2019, 11:03pm
112
Well, apparently it goes against free speech and the Constitution to allow someone to talk about religion at a University.Apparently some there believe a non secularist should not be allowed to speak at a university.
She said that Barr speaking in Notre Dame is unconstitutional ?
Professor Feldman wrote in response to Barr’s speech. “Incredible that a law school would have such a legal know-nothing to speak,” she added.
Great. So who exactly suggested that Barr’s speech was unconstitutional ?
Trump uses Twitter to ramble and rattle incoherently to 65.7 million people. And Barr wants to talk about secularists? Come on Son!
1 Like
DougBH
October 15, 2019, 11:08pm
114
Well, apparently it goes against free speech and the Constitution to allow someone to talk about religion at a University.Apparently some there believe a non secularist should not be allowed to speak at a university.
She said that Barr speaking in Notre Dame is unconstitutional ?
Professor Feldman wrote in response to Barr’s speech. “Incredible that a law school would have such a legal know-nothing to speak,” she added.
Great. So who exactly suggested that Barr’s speech was unconstitutional ?
“Things Bill Barr apparently does not understand religious freedom; secularism; the U.S. Constitution’s guarantees of free speech, freedom of assembly, and religious liberty and how these interrelate,”
What Barr said was in no way against free speech or against the Constitution. They acted like he was up there talking against the Constitution just because he had his own ideas on religion, ethics etc.
W_and_C
October 15, 2019, 11:11pm
115
“Things Bill Barr apparently does not understand religious freedom; secularism; the U.S. Constitution’s guarantees of free speech, freedom of assembly, and religious liberty and how these interrelate,”
What you cited is an opinion voiced by someone - an opinion that states that Barr doesn’t understand the Constitution among other things.
Which is very different than what you originally stated:
Well, apparently it goes against free speech and the Constitution to allow someone to talk about religion at a University.
As if someone actually had suggested that it was unconstitutional to let him speak
1 Like
DougBH
October 15, 2019, 11:13pm
116
As I showed, at least some did not want him to speak, and then it is claimed that he is the one who was against free speech and the Constitution.
No…they were the ones who didn’t want him to speak.
Who were “the ones” who said they didn’t want him to speak?
DougBH
October 15, 2019, 11:14pm
118
Go back and read.
As I showed, at least some did not want him to speak, and then it is claimed that he is the one who was against free speech and the Constitution.
You “showed” nothing of the sort.
I’ve read the thread. Nothing has been sorted, you’re flailing at your attempt to play victim.
DougBH
October 15, 2019, 11:15pm
123
You havent read all the posts though, have you?
No.
You didnt like that other people used their free speech to take issue with Barr’s remarks, so you tried (and failed) to paint him as a victim of evil libs trying to silence him.
Because it’s easier to play victim than make a cogent argument.
Oryx
October 15, 2019, 11:17pm
126
Go back and read.
She said he shouldn’t speak because of his lack of knowledge of the law, not because of his politics.
