I clarified it, but apparently not enough. Is the first video the Casey Petersen under discussion.
Does the second video show he is not a bot?
I clarified it, but apparently not enough. Is the first video the Casey Petersen under discussion.
Does the second video show he is not a bot?
I clarified it, but apparently not enough. Is the first video the Casey Petersen under discussion.
Does the second video show he is not a bot?
You’re still talking about two different people as if they’re one.
Those are two different people in your two different videos.
Good background. It looks like Sandia started with managers is working down to the rest of the lab.
Should Trump sign an executive order banning this kind of training for federal contractors?
That’s generally how it’s done.
No, absolutely not. He shouldn’t even comment on it.
WuWei:I clarified it, but apparently not enough. Is the first video the Casey Petersen under discussion.
Does the second video show he is not a bot?
You’re still talking about two different people.
The FNC story is about the incident. Casey Petersen is not a bot.
/whoops edited wrong window, forgot what was here
Good background. It looks like Sandia started with managers is working down to the rest of the lab.
Should Trump sign an executive order banning this kind of training for federal contractors?
Yeah he should go ahead and do that.
It would be a hugely winning move.
LucyLou: WuWei:Same guy under discussion?
And no, they’re not the same people. Just 2 white guys who look alike.
I clarified it, but apparently not enough. Is the first video the Casey Petersen under discussion.
Does the second video show he is not a bot?
Why would the second video show that he either is or is not?
WuWei:Casey Petersen is not a bot.
No one said that he was, sneaky.
Correct me if I’m wrong but this seems to be an Entire thread based on a thread-reader bot made page from an unverified Twitter thread.
How do I know any of this is accurate or real at all?
Maybe I misunderstood. The incident occurred.
JayJay:No the topic of discussion is a guy at Sandia who made a video claiming the training he got was based on CRT and offering up scant evidence that this was so.
Many here have simply uncritically accepted his claim as factual.
I am highly amused that he decided to throw his career away over the diversity training that everybody in Corporate America has to do these days.
Perhaps that is his objection.
hwyflier: WuWei:Casey Petersen is not a bot.
No one said that he was, sneaky.
hwyflier:Correct me if I’m wrong but this seems to be an Entire thread based on a thread-reader bot made page from an unverified Twitter thread.
How do I know any of this is accurate or real at all?
Maybe I misunderstood. The incident occurred.
Yes you misunderstood.
No one has claimed the incident didn’t happen.
What was claimed is in doubt is Mr. Peterson’s interpretation of events.
We’ll probably never know, it would be interesting to find out how “diverse” the facilitators of the training were.
WuWei: hwyflier: WuWei:Casey Petersen is not a bot.
No one said that he was, sneaky.
hwyflier:Correct me if I’m wrong but this seems to be an Entire thread based on a thread-reader bot made page from an unverified Twitter thread.
How do I know any of this is accurate or real at all?
Maybe I misunderstood. The incident occurred.
Yes you misunderstood.
No one has claimed the incident didn’t happen.
What was claimed is in doubt is Mr. Peterson’s interpretation of events.
Based on what?
Perhaps that is his objection.
It’s a joke and everyone knows it. Just HR nonsense. Watch a video, take a quiz immediately after that asks you about what you saw. Check the box, move on.
Throwing your career away over it is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard in my life. Might as well ruin your life over a PII training.
Based on having only the lens of what Mr. Peterson claimed the training was all about.
TommyLucchese: JayJay:No the topic of discussion is a guy at Sandia who made a video claiming the training he got was based on CRT and offering up scant evidence that this was so.
Many here have simply uncritically accepted his claim as factual.
I am highly amused that he decided to throw his career away over the diversity training that everybody in Corporate America has to do these days.
Perhaps that is his objection.
I think he purposefully chose a new career. Catering to the perpetually aggrieved is lucrative. Google his name. He’s on every single RW website.
JayJay: WuWei: hwyflier: WuWei:Casey Petersen is not a bot.
No one said that he was, sneaky.
hwyflier:Correct me if I’m wrong but this seems to be an Entire thread based on a thread-reader bot made page from an unverified Twitter thread.
How do I know any of this is accurate or real at all?
Maybe I misunderstood. The incident occurred.
Yes you misunderstood.
No one has claimed the incident didn’t happen.
What was claimed is in doubt is Mr. Peterson’s interpretation of events.
Based on what?
Based on one guy’s YouTube video.
WuWei:Perhaps that is his objection.
It’s a joke and everyone knows it. Just HR nonsense. Watch a video, take a quiz immediately after that asks you about what you saw. Check the box, move on.
Throwing your career away over it is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard in my life. Might as well ruin your life over a PII training.
It’s a joke? You don’t believe in the need and effectiveness of diversity and inclusion?
WuWei: JayJay: WuWei: hwyflier: WuWei:Casey Petersen is not a bot.
No one said that he was, sneaky.
hwyflier:Correct me if I’m wrong but this seems to be an Entire thread based on a thread-reader bot made page from an unverified Twitter thread.
How do I know any of this is accurate or real at all?
Maybe I misunderstood. The incident occurred.
Yes you misunderstood.
No one has claimed the incident didn’t happen.
What was claimed is in doubt is Mr. Peterson’s interpretation of events.
Based on what?
Based on one guy’s YouTube video.
Have you taken similar “training”?
LucyLou: WuWei: JayJay: WuWei: hwyflier: WuWei:Casey Petersen is not a bot.
No one said that he was, sneaky.
hwyflier:Correct me if I’m wrong but this seems to be an Entire thread based on a thread-reader bot made page from an unverified Twitter thread.
How do I know any of this is accurate or real at all?
Maybe I misunderstood. The incident occurred.
Yes you misunderstood.
No one has claimed the incident didn’t happen.
What was claimed is in doubt is Mr. Peterson’s interpretation of events.
Based on what?
Based on one guy’s YouTube video.
Have you taken similar “training”?
Haven’t been in the workforce in 20 years.
Maybe I misunderstood. The incident occurred.
Maybe, I know twitter ain’t your thing.
The bot is the link in the OP. You’re reading a twitter thread, from an unverified account, that a bot aggregated into a single page off of twitter.
It’s a handy bot, don’t get me wrong. But I think if it weren’t for that bot making a webpage of tweets into a single page this would be a bit more obvious the source for all this is pretty weak and transparently partisan. I dont really know what our twitter standards are around here anymore, but I thought they were higher than that.
https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1299008750729097216