Didn’t realize that someone is required to love their boss.
No confidence.
Failure to follow chain of command.
History of insubordination.
Suspected leaking.
Look at the bright side. That Ukrainian Defense position might still be open. Strong job market out there. The Vindman twins will do fine. When one door closes another opens.
2 Likes
Why would the Pentagon fire him, he is very well educated with an devoted public servant.
It will be just another 5th Avenue sydrome scenario…Add it to the list.
He never leaked anything,
and followed the chain of command.
What percentage of villanous traitors do you think will fall to Donald’s righteous retribution?
who said thats a requirement?
oh wait - joy behar?
The association strongly suggests otherwise. Loss of trust is sufficient grounds.
We know for certain he did not follow chain of command.
He will be fine…He probably still has that secure residence to protect him from… Whatever he needs protected from.
Talent always moves up.
1 Like
And you know this how?
I’ve seen in closed door hearings he refused to name who he talked to out of fear of outing a non-whistle-blower he claims he didn’t kneo the name of.
2 Likes
how did he not follow the chain of command.
you know it isn’t the WB and didn’t leak anything to the WB.
he had nothing to do with the complaint.
One down. On to the next ■■■■ head. 
1 Like
oh wow. how do you know?
such faith
1 Like
how do you know Trump isn’t part lizard.
lolYou mean, told people he expected to have to leave earlier.
Totally not a cult.
Pray about it
2 Likes
Yeah, they have a lot of faith in the Vindman twins.
“In your deposition you emphasize the importance of chain of command. You were a direct report to Dr. Fiona Hill and then Mr. Tim Morrison and they were your seniors, correct?” Wenstrup asked Vindman, who is currently serving on the NSC staff at the White House.
“That is correct,” the officer answered.
“When you had concerns about the 7/25 call between the two presidents, you didn’t go to Mr. Morrison about that, did you?” Wenstrup asked.
“I immediately went to John Eisenberg, the [NSC’s] lead legal counsel,” Vindman responded.
“That doesn’t seem like chain of command,” the GOP lawmaker said.
Vindman then said he attempted to convey his concerns to Morrison, but was not able to do so.
Wenstrup responded by reading from the officer’s closed-door testimony before the House Intelligence Committee from late last month.
“‘I forwarded my concerns through the chain of command, and the seniors then decide the action to take,'” the congressman said, quoting Vindman.
Wenstrup confirmed again that Vindman had not followed his chain of command: In other words, his earlier testimony was false.
2 Likes
Let’s not forget that Mr. Vindman said in so many words that he was very bothered that Trump did not follow Mr. Vindman’s talking points and that he, Mr Vindman was very bothered with Trump overusing Mr Vindman’s policy preference. Total insubordination. He should not only be fired he should be stripped of his rank and relegated to shining Trump’s shoes.
2 Likes
Overriding not overusing - thanks Apple. Ugh
