I would prefer DeSantis to Trump at this point, age and baggage are the primary reasons. (Of course I m curious who else will run of course).
DeSantis has been a really good Governor and he’s shown he could care less about the lying left’s predictable smears and half truths.
Conservatives need to boot the sickness the left has brought to the House and Senate out of control this November first but I could easily see myself voting for and volunteering for a DeSantis campaign.
The only one of those qualities Biden possesses is the fuddy duddy part.
DeSantis Scott would be a good ticket doncha think!
Why not Scott/Desantis?
Governor as opposed to Senator…
Central as opposed to state …
You can make that argument…I m a huge fan of Tim Scott and if he is on the top of the ticket he will have my vote…his story is awesome.
I m just a believer that Governors have better management experience and Governor DeSantis has proven himself in Florida as more than capable.
I have tremendous respect for both men.
There are several very impressive potential candidates on the Republican side…the potential Republican candidates have me kind of excited.
Democrats have what, Hillary and the current failed transportation Secretary?
Fweedom Harris.
Maybe she can get less than 1% of the primary vote again? 
Who’s looking for points, we only look for the truth.
Stop projecting just because the left thinks that way!
If there are none, why do you object to stopping them?
While I like what I hear/see regarding DeSantis… I am predisposed to dislike lawyers in the POTUS chair. We have lawyers leading the legislative and judicial branches. That’s appropriate. Do we really need one leading the executive branch as well?
Right… just in case. Like we are told about fascism.
that plus countless rigging
they know what they are doing.
they know it’s being taught, but not officially so they hide behind their demand to show where it’s on any curriculum.
You guys are falling into @PurpnGold’s trap.
Critical Theory is not “being taught” like you are saying. It is a philosophy through which everything is taught.
It is a set of principles applied to literally everything. A way of thinking. Of processing.
The teachers of math, science, English, history, literature, government, civics, and yes, law have already been taught.
They are teaching their subjects with the CT lens. All of them.
You can call it “spin” or any of 1,000 other names. I like lens. Or goggles.
It is a culture, language, philosophy. A complete system.
It is more akin to a religion than a class.
If I am a child’s teacher and I teach the child any subject with that lens, then that lens gets reinforced at every level, what does the child only know coming out the other end of the pipeline?
Look at the myths and fairytales we were taught in school as children we still believe.
CT seeks to swap one lens for another. Hegemony. That’s all.
I don’t have to teach children CT, they are being taught everything through (with?) CT.
That’s the beauty of the indoctrination.
I object because the definition being applied to “CRT in schools” is inaccurate and it’s making some school districts ban certain curriculum on very important figures/stories/movements in black history. When you define CRT in such a way that it captures ANY discuss on race in this country… there are unintended (maybe intend) consequences.
CT isn’t CRT. They can’t be used interchangeably to mean the same thing.
I thought we went through this already? Get past the acronyms.
I think the libs would have a fit if Scott was on the undercard. First it will be white man keeping thumb on black men. Then move to Uncle Scott.
