LOL libs are never bias...right?

[Blackwolf]

Seems like libs never do anything without accussing someone of biasism, which is of course uncromulent.

[conan]

Both sides heard the same information, both side came to their own conclusion…you just have one on left side bitching about biases.

You figure it out.

[SixFoot]

@conan

Inquiring minds want to know.

Libs have it on good authority that the Supreme Court is infallible and correct in every decision it makes. When they speak, it’s the Law of the Land. There is no possible way any of their decisions could be considered biased when an institution is that divine in stature.

[SixFoot]

@Scratch

@zantax

Hmm, maybe people with no marketable skill.

Hmm…looks like the boot strappy people in Red States fall into that category more than other states.

What’s 10% of California to 20% of Louisiana?

Take your time, math is hard.

[conan]

What this tells me that Sotomayor and possibly other left-wing justices are getting upset because they’re not getting their way.

I believe she is exposing cracks within the SCOTUS. I’m sure frustration within libs ranks are getting to em.

[mobulis]

@conan

Seems like Sonia Sotomayor got her panties up in bunch…OK gross but you get the picture has accused Conservative justices of biasism. in their 5 to 4 decision for “wealth test” for legal immigrants.

The policy in question, the Immigration and Nationality Act, makes immigrants who are “likely at any time to become a public charge” ineligible for green cards. The policy virtually bars legal immigrants from using public assistance, including Medicaid, housing vouchers and food stamps. The five conservative justices ruled in favor of the stay, while the liberal justices — including Sotomayor — opposed it.

So how can you accuse other side of being bias when your side displayed the exact some bias as well?

Can only one side be bias while other side is not?

Inquiring minds want to know.

https://thehill.com/legal/484195-sotomayor-accuses-supreme-court-of-bias-toward-trump-administration

It takes one to know one.

[mobulis]

@conan

In her case she accuse conservatives being bias while ignoring their own biasism from left side of the bench.

Is she not being hypocritical herself?

Probably, but it doesn’t make her wrong.

[mobulis]

@SixFoot

@conan

Inquiring minds want to know.

Libs have it on good authority that the Supreme Court is infallible and correct in every decision it makes. When they speak, it’s the Law of the Land. There is no possible way any of their decisions could be considered biased when an institution is that divine in stature.

That’s your view not us.

[conan]

I know I’m bias…thanks for pointing out my experience in recognizing when one is bias.

[SixFoot]

Big gaping holes.

[Adam]

@SixFoot

@Scratch

@zantax

Hmm, maybe people with no marketable skill.

Hmm…looks like the boot strappy people in Red States fall into that category more than other states.

What’s 10% of California to 20% of Louisiana?

Take your time, math is hard.

10 percent less as a percentage of population. Which state are you from?

[H_Arendt]

@conan

Both sides heard the same information, both side came to their own conclusion…you just have one on left side bitching about biasism.

You figure it out.

If you read the article you would have a different issue to discuss… but its more fun to criticize liberals than ready about Supreme Court decisions.

Sotomayor was identifying how the conservative block agrees with every Trump emergency appeal without ever looking at a case.

Care to cite a case or two where liberals have done the same?

If you can’t then you really don’t have a whataboutism argument.

[conan]

What this does is point out just how important this Nov election is…not just reelecting Trump but keeping the senate as well.

They can have the damn house for all I care…well I hope they lose that as well but senate is far more important for long term goal ATM.

[SixFoot]

What’s 10% of California to 10% of Missouri?

Take your time, math is hard.

[conan]

If Sotomayor is so frustrated maybe she should quit.

[SixFoot]

@conan

If Sotomayor is so frustrated maybe she should quit.

Wouldn’t be difficult to find a replacement for her. SCOTUS wouldn’t bat an eye without her.

[Adam]

No the math is still good. By your logic 100 percent of Alabama on food stamps makes them better than 9-10 percent of California. Better people in Bama.

[zantax]

@H_Arendt

@conan

Both sides heard the same information, both side came to their own conclusion…you just have one on left side bitching about biasism.

You figure it out.

If you read the article you would have a different issue to discuss… but its more fun to criticize liberals than ready about Supreme Court decisions.

Sotomayor was identifying how the conservative block agrees with every Trump emergency appeal without ever looking at a case.

Care to cite a case or two where liberals have done the same?

If you can’t then you really don’t have a whataboutism argument.

Maybe you haven’t been following, the court has warned circuit courts to knock off the nationwide stays. Maybe that is why.

[fallenturtle]

So this is a lie?

Sotomayor said the court has not looked at this case, as well as other appeals of the administration’s policies, objectively and is quick to rule in favor of President Trump.

“This Court is partly to blame for the breakdown in the appellate process,” Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, wrote. “That is because the Court—in this case, the New York cases, and many others—has been all too quick to grant the Government’s ‘reflexiv[e]’ requests. But make no mistake: Such a shift in the Court’s own behavior comes at a cost.”

[SixFoot]

I understand that you can’t fumble your way out of explaining why that for every one person in the backwater swamp lands of Louisiana on food stamps, 4 people in the 5th Largest Economy on Earf are on food stamps.

For every one person in Missouri, it’s 64 in California.

Go stare at some stock numbers some more. That only requires addition and subtraction.