Typical snide, condescending attitude about others. Itâs disguised as giving a good gosh darn about so called womenâs rights and womenâs health, but it really does show contempt for women in assuming 1) they canât pay for their own essentials, or wonât, and 2) they canât or wonât restrain their own desires.
Iâm sure if a Red Crescent free health clinic was asked to perform services unacceptable to the Muslim faith, some posters here would be squealing like stuck pigs.
But an order of Christian monastics restraining their desires and actually living the poverty and chastity they preach, theyâre fair game.
Disgusting mindset, proof positive that they really see some as more equal than others.
From the perspective of the inherent worth of every human life, itâs easy to justify it.
From the sociopolitical perspective, itâs hard to justify. That sticking point would sink a ban on the remaining 99% of unjustifiable abortions. I do not see hope for a ban on abortions that does not allow for that exception. I understand that reality and would not get in the way of a ban that accounts for that exception.
Actually, itâs a form of life control. That baby gets birthed. It comes out one way or another. The only question is whether or not it comes out dead or alive.
High school biology makes it clear that a new, unique human life starts at conception.
Development is just a part of how that life grows once it is started, and is more the subject of embryology, which is a more advanced course usually taken by college biology and pre-med majors.
Only because you choose to interpret it that way. But the reality is govt funded birth control has been proven to lower pregnancy rates, this lowers abortion rates. So yes if you eliminate this funding pregnancy and abortion will rise.