Anti corporate terrorism is still terrorism
Mangione still faces state second-degree murder charges in New York. He also faces federal charges including murder by firearm plus additional state charges in Pennsylvania.
There is also the possibility that he could face additional federal or state charges.
1 Like
Agreed
It seems impossible right? I mean, he was caught on video executing a husband and father with a shot to the back. Open and shut case. But we’re talking New York. Pretty much any poll will tell you that more liberals than conservatives are in favor of killing people who think differently than them. And the younger the lib, the more homicidal he/she tends to be. New York is packed full of young hipsters who believe that it’s ok to simply put a bullet in someone if you don’t like what they say or how they run their business. Just kill them like every fascist or communist dictator in history has done. So all you need is for one of these death cult members to make his way on to the jury and we have a hung jury. Do that enough and the case gets dropped. Or the liberal judge could simply allow the defense to stack the jury as they did with O.J. and Luigi walks. Thoughts?
https://thehill.com/national-security/5504569-americans-political-violence-poll/
1 Like
Wait…wut?
Cite poll please.
Double wut?
Triple wut?
Is that a real theory?
2 Likes
What if the judge buys him dinner and then they go to a movie?
1 Like
Yeah…stop making up nonsense. 
2 Likes
Says the party pushing Groypers as to why the shooter did what he did !
Are you really on these boards defending Groypers?
I need to know because I need to understand how seriously I should take you the next time you lecture us that the temperature of discourse should be lowered.
2 Likes
Mangione’s fate regardless of whatever direction the political winds blow his trial, he remains a cold blooded killer. If convicted, it’s the state of NY and he will at a minimum spend his miserable life in a prison unless he’s let out on parole. Hopefully as in the case of Mark Chapman whose parole has been denied multiple times, that never happens.
1 Like
He’ll be convicted of murder.
All that was dropped was the first degree/terrorism charge and also the second degree/terrorism charge.
Methinks the OPer is now exaggerating a wee bit about what that means…
Wonder if some do gooder organization throws uber cash at the killer’s defense? You know, a “high profile criminal defense” attorneys. Flashy, expensive suits lots of media face time etc etc.
Too many weekly (D)og words this week.
Thats up to them. Who really cares?
Yes, unfortunately the two threads got merged.
I’ve a few thoughts on this. First, it probably is terrorism in a sense. He was making a statement kill to all millionaire CEOs who thrive off the suffering of others, especially in the health care space. There was a tangible fear in the air after that CEO was killed and you could sense it, you could also sense how some saw the killing as understandable. To me, terrorism is symbolic and is meant to effectuate fear or change in a given population, and he certainly did.
On the other hand, we have a sense of what terrorists are, and he doesn’t easily fit into that bucket. The Jury might find that charge specious and decline to find him guilty because it doesn’t fit into a conventional narrative of what a terrorist is or looks like. Dropping this might make his prosecution easier. And the Prosecution might need that because who he killed is not a sympathetic figure, if the Defense can paint this CEO as a heartless monster thriving off the suffering of a helpless population, he might get off. No need complicating matters by throwing in terrorism, this is going to be tough to win on its face.
1 Like
I don’t think a defense attorney would be allowed to make a case for innocence by painting the CEO as someone who “deserved it”.
The judge would put a stop to that.
He would either have to inject some reasonable doubt that Luigi is who did it or mount an “insanity” defense…if that’s what they call it nowadays.
Bull ■■■■■ I just gave you a link to “any” poll.
Seriously I have to ask this question.
What’s with the obsession with me rather than addressing the topic? You have to be brain dead to think that I don’t already know your opinion of me. Give it a rest. It’s creepy…and boring.
1 Like