Less than a week and Biden gets a lose in court . .

[SpacemanSpiff]

Activist judge.

[WuWei]

@zantax

@WuWei

@Scratch

I know its been a rough couple months for you Trumpers…If this gets ya through today, good for you…lol.

Off to a rousing start…lol

Not feeling the unity yet?

With the judiciary? I am today, Jbiden probably isn’t.

[zantax]

@SpacemanSpiff

Activist judge.

oops wrong thread, no coffee yet, never mind

[WuWei]

@SpacemanSpiff

Activist judge.

In jurisdiction.

[SixFoot]

Time to see how all those judicial appointments pan out.

[zantax]

@SixFoot

Time to see how all those judicial appointments pan out.

until dems pack the courts anyway.

[Auto129]

@Snow96

Texas’ lawsuit claims that the administration would be violating an agreement it has with the Department of Homeland Security – and would require at least 180 days’ notice, as well as consultation, prior to implementing changes in immigration policy.

I wonder why this supercedes the executive’s authority over the Department of Homeland Security.

[Snow96]

@Auto129

I wonder why this supercedes the executive’s authority over the Department of Homeland Security.

Written binding agreement. The new director of homeland security would need to renegotiate, or if there is a cancelation clause in the agreement follow it. They just can’t ignore a signed agreement.

[Bosun]

It will be tough for the JoBana crowd when they see what else he is going sign off for.

All y’all got what you paid for and longer unemployment line.

[sikofit]

@Snow96

The new director of homeland security would need to renegotiate,

No they wouldn’t. They just need to give 180 days notice

[NCREDSTATE]

@Auto129

I wonder why this supercedes the executive’s authority over the Department of Homeland Security.

My what short memories.

Remember DACA?

[WuWei]

@sikofit

@Snow96

The new director of homeland security would need to renegotiate,

No they wouldn’t. They just need to give 180 days notice

See you after Independence Day.

[Snow96]

@Snow96

The new director of homeland security would need to renegotiate, or if there is a cancelation clause in the agreement follow it.

@sikofit

No they wouldn’t. They just need to give 180 days notice

Nice to see you cut off my quote of “or if there is a cancelation clause in the agreement follow it.”

You know the 180 day thing you just mentioned?

tsk tsk tsk on selective editing my friend.

[Zander]

@TheDoctorIsIn

Yes, of course.

I’m sure a 14-day TRO regarding a day-one EO is definitely going to “sink” Biden’s Presidency.

[Executive Order - TRO? 14 days] Sunk

anon

[WuWei]

Biden deportation ban tripped up by same 73-year-old law that hampered Trump...

Federal judge said directive appeared to violate the Administrative Procedure Act for being ‘arbitrary and capricious’

Goes around comes around…

[DougBH]

@Auto129

@Snow96

Texas’ lawsuit claims that the administration would be violating an agreement it has with the Department of Homeland Security – and would require at least 180 days’ notice, as well as consultation, prior to implementing changes in immigration policy.

I wonder why this supercedes the executive’s authority over the Department of Homeland Security.

I wonder why either the agreement or the executive orders would supersede our immigration laws which passed Congress and were signed by a prior President.