Laura Loomer Files FEC Complaint Against Twitter

Yes. She tweeted about it. Are you seriously unaware of her past?

1 Like

It’s all related.

Not the basis of the ruling against Trump. Trump was using his personal twitter account to conduct the business of the Office of the President. Political annuncements, firing people (even though he hires the very best…), etc.

That is why he lost.
.
.
.
.WW, PHS

It looks like Laura Loomer has taken Ann Coulter’s shtick to a new level.

Coulter’s best ploy, until almost every progressive in America realized that it was best to ignore her, was to make an outrageous statement, provoke a negative reaction, and then present herself as the victim in the situation.

Loomer has extended the same game to social media, but its basically a Coulter reprise.

2 Likes

Exactly

1 Like

Honestly that’s almost exclusively the Republican playbook these days.

1 Like

Just to get into the weeds here tho- why is Loomer banned but not Trump? He has posted some vile things. I know that some of them have been deleted by twitter- but I’m pretty certain any body else who has tweeted some of what Trump has tweeted would be banned from twitter.

1 Like

Okay. Thank you. I went to the link (NBC LOL). It says that she said: ā€œSomeone needs to create a non Islamic form of Uber or Lyft because I never want to support another Islamic immigrant driver.ā€

Okay. She is stating that she does not want her money going to support Islamic immigrants. So what. That is not hate. It may be unpopular, you may have an opinion on whether or not it is appropriate, but it is not hate. Let me tell you, if I could do it here, I could type out a sentence that would teach you the real meaning of the word ā€œHateā€. Your screen would melt. This is not hate. Speech you do not like is not automatically hate.

Hey, you know what? I purposely do not spend money at places that I suspect are sending that money to foreign countries. Like Lara, I choose to spend my money elsewhere.

The problem with Liberals is that EVERYTHING to them is hate. If I am pro traditional marriage then to them that means I spread HATE against homosexuals. Just like with racism, Liberals have over-used the word ā€œHateā€ so much that it no longer means anything.

What Lara said is not hate. Once again NBC is Fake News

Schtick. Yes, schtick. That I can accept. But it ain’t hate.

Because you can post something even more hateful than what she said does not negate her actions

If i were to publicly announce that I refuse to support another Christian or I refuse to support another white person that would be hateful just like it was in loony Loomer’s case

1 Like

Aaah- I just dug into it…

"Twitter published a blog post publicly codifying what had already been company policy, saying that ā€œBlocking a world leader from Twitter or removing their controversial Tweets would hide important information people should be able to see and debate.ā€

So essentially for Trump and any world leader…anything goes.

You are underestimating the Republicans in the variety of their shticks.

There’s the Susan Collins Hamlet imitation.

ā€œOh I don’t know what to do. Watch me struggle. Know what, this time I’m, voting with Trump AGAINā€

There’s the Lindsay Graham bootlicker who suddenly loves all things Trump.

And there’s Mitch McConnell’s Lenin imitation: ā€œI have the power comrades and I intend to use it however I want!ā€

2 Likes

One has a right to speech.

One does not have a right to use someone else’s private platform… for free even.

1 Like

So this is a laugh.

1 Like

I find conservatives tend to cast all political issues in emotional term. People they disagree with ā€œloveā€ this, ā€œhateā€ that, ā€œfearā€ other things.

I prefer the progressive view which is that politics is a rational process of weighing conflicting interests, not an endless battle over emotional states.

I don’t know whether Laura Loomer hates anyone or is just playing a role to gain attention. It does not matter. She is proposing discrimination on the basis of religion. Not only is that inconsistent with the First Amendment, but if someone is trying to run a business that is looking to maximize profits they are not going to practice discrimination and may not want to support public figures who are using their platforms to encourage discrimination.

2 Likes

Ugh this again… how many times do we have to go through this.

Twitter verifies that the person claiming to be the political candidate is in fact that person. That stops others from claiming to be someone they are not. They do the same thing for celebrities and other famous individuals. If they didn’t you’d have multiple accounts claiming to be someone and there’d be no way to tell who is who. Verifying an account is not a political activity.

Also, the court decision that Trump was not allowed to ban twitter followers had nothing to do with how twitter is categorized. The courts found that Trump was using his twitter account in an official government capacity to deliver information. The public cannot be banned from official government information sources.

1 Like

Yeah, on a couple of levels.

Even if Loomer’s complaint had merit (it doesn’t), and even if the FEC wanted to drop a big ruling on social media stuff - they can’t. The FEC hasn’t had enough members to make quorum since August.

It’s almost as if Republicans are starting to regret neutering election laws.

3 Likes

That wasn’t quite where I was going.
Facebook, Twitter etc are functioning as a public space even though they are privately owned (made people richer than god) and privately controlled.

I wasn’t promoting a solution, but highlighting a delema. At what point does a private entity become a public commons. When does the action of the public (ā€œwe like it, we post everything on itā€) justify taking control of a private enterprise from the owners?

In my analogy, what if that bar is the only eatery in town. What if there is no grocery store and its the only in town food source?

As far as Loomer goes, I see this suit as an extension of her desire and skill at trolling.

LOL. Liberals do it all the time and then get Grammy Awards, LOLLLL.

Do you really want me to start listing the truly hateful things Leftists say? We could be here a very long time.

How about this: Peter Fonda said, ā€œWe should rip Barron Trump from his mother’s arms and put him in a cage with pedophilesā€¦ā€

Did Hollywood ban him from anything? Is he banned from Twitter?

Is this witch banned from Twitter?

I think you guys need to check yourselves.

ā€œYe blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.ā€ Do you know what that means?