Two principals to the ticket. Both of whom, separately made the same “misspeak” ceases to be a “misspeak”.
That’s not proof of a fact… and they didn’t even say the same thing, Your just making an assumption. You have a theory that there’s a conspiracy afoot.
And even if it were true, as far as a response to altair1013 is concerned, she’s not a socialist either.
Yes if a judge agrees to bail.
What accusations do you think warrant automatic imprisonment regardless of evidence presented and the rule of law?
Well at least you think you are right, that’s something I guess.
If there is a credible accusation someone raped a child, no bail should be granted period. But if some moron judge allows it, it is reprehensible that anyone else would pay it for him. But by all means, get Harris and Biden to explain to America why they think it’s a good idea to do it.
Do we get to vote for the judge or the group raising bail? Nope.
exactly
see, to the anarchist left, being arrested and accused is never fair. and always unjust
There’s a lot of "if"s in there, so let me see if I understand. I asked “What accusations do you think warrant automatic imprisonment regardless of evidence presented and the rule of law?” and you replied child rape is so vile that the accusation by itself deserves incarceration before trial in all cases. Am I reading that correctly? and if not let me ask…
You seem to have missed the credible accusation part.
You misunderstood what I was saying. I was pointing out she was still bailing out a suspected rapist.
I wouldn’t know about the anarchist left, but I think we in America we use trials to determine the truth before verdicts, and sentencing. America love it or leave it.
why worry if an accused child rapist is back on the street??
huh?
Nobody is suggesting child rapists don’t get a trial, so put that straw man to bed.
1 Like
why worry that an innocent person is incarcerated??
1 Like
Interesting post.
1 Like
The guy running the bail fund flat out said he doesn’t even look at the charges. As in, makes no effort to discern whether they are likely guilty or innocent.
The problem is you won’t answer my question. What accusations do you think warrant automatic imprisonment regardless of evidence presented and the rule of law?
I still have to get to who should decide if an accusation is credible if not a judge?
1 Like
We will right you down for no incarceration at all until the trail has determined guilt in all cases.
that didnt happen not was it about to
out of arguments i see
yeah not surprised
