Kamala Harris is trying to obstruct justice

[SeaManatee]

They will send in several taped episodes of Hannity’s show and Trump chanting lock her up on a loop.

[calirepub]

@Bodecea

@BillBrown

@mollyBrown

Why would the president’s personal lawyer be able to bring up criminal charges? Honestly, people would be better served if they understood basic government functions.

That goes for you to.
Anyone can report what they believe to be a federal crime by calling the FBI.

Which begs the question, why don’t all those people on this forum and others who claim that H. Clinton committed crimes call the FBI and report her with their evidence?

Donald Trump’s justice department is actively covering up for the crimes of the Clintons and Obamas. The trump administration is either in on the conspiracy or they are being blackmailed. The is no other plausible answer for why the Clintons and Obamas aren’t in jail already.

[mollyBrown]

@BillBrown

@mollyBrown

Why would the president’s personal lawyer be able to bring up criminal charges? Honestly, people would be better served if they understood basic government functions.

That goes for you to.
Anyone can report what they believe to be a federal crime by calling the FBI.

Reporting is not the same as charging as the op said. My post stands.

[DougBH]

@FloridaYankee

@DougBH

Her statement that Barr “should not act as the Presidents henchman” could be seen as an attempt to intimidate Barr from investigating the illegal leaks and possible other corrupt activity that may have occurred in the leadership of the FBI under Obama…similar to the way that President Trumps asking Comey if he could go easy on Flynn might be viewed as an attempt to change his investigation.
As Mueller explained, it depends on whether there is a corrupt intent.
Clearly Camala is on thin ice here, using the standards some read into the Mueller report. Is she trying to use her position to stop an investigation? If so, is there corrupt intent?
Hmmmm…

I see your point but it could also be a simple warning to keep it on the straight and narrow, and such warning would not be without justification.

Perception, or suspicion, is not enough, there needs to be actionable evidence. Hell the Mueller report contained ten instances of Trump trying to influence underlings to obstruct justice, that ain’t small potatoes. Should that be “prosecuted”?

Maybe he was simply trying to keep the investigaton on the straight and narrow.

“Corrupt Intent”, IMO, is too subjective and vague to have in a criminal law. True, just my opinion.

[AmusedObserver]

@PSF

Please, please, please, Rudy Giuliani, Jay Sekulow, etc. please bring obstruction of justice charges against Kamala Harris and all the others

In exactly what capacity could Giuliani or Sekulow bring charges? They work for Trump, not for us Americans, though after seeing Barr’s recent performance I can understand your confusion between those roles.

[Plasmaball]

Look at you trying to turn this one around now on people…

[BillBrown]

@mollyBrown

Reporting is not the same as charging as the op said. My post stands.

Yes it is.

bring a charge against

bring a charge against (someone)

To officially or publicly claim that another person has committed a crime or misdeed.

The OP used the term “bring charges against”. Anyone can claim that a person has committed a crime.

Please, please, please, Rudy Giuliani, Jay Sekulow, etc. please bring obstruction of justice charges against Kamala Harris

[Plasmaball]

God this is some weak made up ■■■■■■■■■

[Plasmaball]

Because you guys have no issue declaring things

[calirepub]

I’m charging Hillary Clinton with all kinds of crimes.

[rolltide]

Righties are sooooo UNoriginal.

All they ever do is copy what the left does and try to make it their own. This is just another example.

[mollyBrown]

@BillBrown

@mollyBrown

Reporting is not the same as charging as the op said. My post stands.

Yes it is.

bring a charge against

bring a charge against (someone)

To officially or publicly claim that another person has committed a crime or misdeed.

The OP used the term “bring charges against”. Anyone can claim that a person has committed a crime.

Please, please, please, Rudy Giuliani, Jay Sekulow, etc. please bring obstruction of justice charges against Kamala Harris

Cool cool cool. I am charging Trump with obstruction. This is fun!

[BillBrown]

Go for it.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

Wow.

So a New York City crook can do anything but it’s Kamala Harris’ fault.

This is not your grandfather’s Republican party.

[BillBrown]

@CaughtInTheMiddle

Wow.

So a New York City crook can do anything but it’s Kamala Harris’ fault.

This is not your grandfather’s Republican party.

I haven’t seen reference to the Republican Party anywhere in this thread.
Why fabricate?

[Bodecea]

@BillBrown

@Bodecea

@BillBrown

@mollyBrown

Why would the president’s personal lawyer be able to bring up criminal charges? Honestly, people would be better served if they understood basic government functions.

That goes for you to.
Anyone can report what they believe to be a federal crime by calling the FBI.

Which begs the question, why don’t all those people on this forum and others who claim that H. Clinton committed crimes call the FBI and report her with their evidence?

How do you know they haven’t?

Well then…what has come of it?

[pam95650]

Why in the ■■■■ should Harris be charged with obstruction? Sweet jesus, where in the world did you get that idea? I know, someone on FOX?

[DougBH]

We have seen that she has spoken out against Barr, just as he mentioned investigating illegal leaks and the historical spying against the Trump campaign. I cannot say that she has committed a crime nor can I exonerate her.

[GrandWazoo]

And how specifically is she doing this?

[SimplyTrying]

@conan

Keep in mind there are two standards, one for libs and another one for us that belongs in basket of deplorables.

Not two standards. Two baskets.