The oversight committee thinks there is. And since they have altered transcripts in the past, with good reason. What there is not, is a good or valid reason for withholding them
It was happening.
Link?
You’re wrong.
Jezcoe:Executive privilege is more than that.
It does not include taped interviews in a criminal proceding… ask Nixon
The Hur investigation was not a criminal proceeding.
Given that the committee has a complete transcript of the tapes, the likelihood of finding anything new is basically nill.
Wrong.
It is unfortunate the the Republican House Majority sees its role as acting primarily as a campaign committee but that’s where things stand.
Executive privilege on the interview was waived when they gave the transcript.
Mmmmmmm.
What do you call a special counsel investigating crimes?
The oversight committee thinks there is. A
The Oversight Committee has been investigating the President and his family for the past year and half. Not a single piece of legislation has been generated out of all that expenditure of taxpayer dollars. That claim is no more than a fig leaf that barely hides Comer and Gym Jordan’s purely political intent.
executive privilege does not protect the mode of communication or reporting, it protects the substance. The substance has already been released
If the tapes match the transcripts, why would they claim executive privilege over them?
and? there is no requirement they produce anything. its oversight.
fear of what you think might happen that could embarrass you is not a valid claim of executive privilege, especially since the privilege was already waived regarding the substance of the interview
executive privilege does not protect the mode of communication or reporting, it protects the substance. The substance has already been released
Executive privilege can be declared at any time. It is then up to others to accept or deny.
Please quote this means vs substance claim.
If the tapes match the transcripts, why would they claim executive privilege over them?
Hearing it would no doubt be much more impactful than words on a page.
I think Hur was very charitable in his characterization.
Imagine 80 million voters listening and saying “Damn! It’s worse than I thought!”
So, executive privilege because the imbecile in chief sounds like a moron…and we can’t let the unwashed masses hear that.
80 million fools.
Basically. I think the cognitive decline is much worse than they are letting on. Of course he started very low to begin with.
Look at how bad it is in rehearsed remarks and manipulated questions where they have some control.
Remember how they tried to diminish FDR’s polio?
Basically. I think the cognitive decline is much worse than they are letting on. Of course he started very low to begin with.
Look at how bad it is in rehearsed remarks and manipulated questions where they have some control.
Remember how they tried to diminish FDR’s polio?
It’s way worse than they’re letting on, and all the go-pills and injectable bumps in the world are starting to lose their potency.
H_Arendt:Which is why the committee had a public session with Hur. He had every opportunity to report if the transcript was inaccurate
LOL… the whitewasher in chief
Biden WILLFULLY held classified materials (illegal), but we should not prosecute him because a Jury will think he’s their kind but forgetful uncle.
Nothing kind about Biden.
He’s a nasty son of a gun who has no problem even attacking voters who don’t support him.
How much adrenaline and red bull can they pump into this guy before he strokes out?
Nothing kind about Biden.
He’s a nasty son of a gun who has no problem even attacking voters who don’t support him.
To be fair, he has to play off the rage of his loyalists…that’s really all he has.