Looks like this is going to the Supreme Court will be interesting to see where this lands.
“Lawyers for the Justice Department immediately responded by issuing a notice to appeal the decision in a higher court, and the case is likely to go all the way to the Supreme Court. The Biden administration is fighting to protect its “asylum ineligibility rule,” which requires asylum-seekers to schedule an appointment for an asylum hearing at a legal port of entry or prove that they had already sought and been denied asylum in another country while en route to the U.S.”
The policy would make undocumented migrants crossing the southern border ineligible for asylum if they did not first make a claim in a country they passed through on their way to the U.S. The Biden administration has said it wants to incentivize more migrants to apply for asylum in their home countries, before making the dangerous trip.
^^^^^^^^^^ sounds like a good idea ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A federal judge in San Francisco dealt a major blow to a signature piece of President Joe Biden’s immigration policy on Tuesday, calling its rule that limits who can apply for asylum at the southern border “both substantively and procedurally invalid.”
^^^^^^^ San Francisco eh? I’m shocked…shocked I tell ya ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Having observed the corrupt Biden Administration with Mayorkas in charge of this area, makes me wonder if this wasn’t coordinated to purposefully play both sides of the aisle. It was only introduced in February and here we are just 5 months later and it’s shot down. Hmmmmmmm…
There is nothing wrong with the border and the current migration system it is working fine New York and other places just needs more flyers along the southern border
The APA strikes again. APA is an unconstitutional piece of ■■■■ law that should be thrown out. It is nothing but an open-ended black hole for Judges to overrule policy decisions that they disagree with and should have no input on.
I would not even want to imagine it without the existence of the APA.
Even such a big government individual as Franklin D. Roosevelt himself admitted that the increasing administrative and judicial power of Federal agencies was leading to a too powerful administrative state and supported proposals to pass such an act. It finally came to pass in 1946.
The APA is a powerful protection for individual rights against arbitrary and overreaching agency actions.
However, it does need substantial updating.
And the Chevron Doctrine desperately needs to be overturned and the APA steered back to its original purpose, which is to protect individuals, not agencies.
It looks like we will dump Chevron in the next 12 months.
But substantial legislative reform of the APA is not likely in the near future.
The APA is nothing more than policy stare decisis being forced on the executive branch by courts. It’s an unconstitutional infringement on executive power which serves to empower judges to make decisions to block policies they disagree with. We elect the President to enact his policies, nt to continue the policies of the last president.
…and what’s both amazing and disappointing is the sheoplized Brandonites regurgibleating the nonsensical lies they’ve been fed that border crossings are way down under Biden.
