I’m confused. Biden used an EO to set this up. Why can’t Trump use an EO to undo it.
Predictably, an Obama activist judge says no.
2 Likes
Just another example of the left assuring everyone that they know better than the American people.
4 Likes
cuz…this is different
Judge Indira Talwani of the Federal District Court in Boston
On September 24, 2013, President Barack Obama nominated Talwani
3 Likes
Exactly. LW judicial activism.
1 Like
Nobody reads any more
The Trump admin decision
But the notice in the Federal Register said some migrants in the U.S. under CHNV may be allowed to remain in the country on a case-by-case basis.
The court decision
The Termination of Parole Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans, 90 Fed. Reg. 13611 (Mar. 25, 2025), is hereby STAYED pending further court order insofar as it revokes, without case-by-case review
By the way the program was neither setup nor cancelled via executive order
This will get sorted out.
I am not against an appeal for productive and otherwise law abiding applicants.
I want the criminals out first.
1 Like
Obaminated… 
3 Likes
Well, these aren’t illegal immigrants. Do we agree that some immigration is alright?
These people flew into the US, had sponsors here, passed a health check and were granted legal status to be here. They were given a parole of sorts, and work permits.
Now Noem seeks to revoke a previous granted parole and work permits despite these immigrants following the letter of the law and legally working here. And the Judge rightfully states the program can be DC’d, as is their right to do so, but those who are already here should be able to stay. They broke no law, they did everything by the book.
They did not enter the country legally.
They broke US immigration law by entering the country illegally.
Let the “case by case” process begin. There’s over half million of these “migrants” in question. The review process will take forever and in the meantime these illegal invaders get to stay in America benefiting from a lame ass policy cooked up to change the electorate. Go ahead prove me wrong.
They entered through a legal program, they pre-arranged coming here, flew in, had sponsors and jobs waiting for them and passed health checks. They did not enter illegally.
1 Like
Benefiting by working
Appeals court or SC will put this nitwit in his/her place.
This rinky dink judge is way over reaching his authority.
Oh yeah. He’ll get overturned just like the other lawfare obstructions.
1 Like
Show me.
It’s in your own article. Instead of repeating “show me,” because you can’t be bothered to read the things you post.
1 Like
You made the assertion in your op.
Why don’t you “show me” the executive order by Biden and Trump.
1 Like
The judge is reversing the purpose of the law, which says parole is to be on a case by case basis. The logical conclusion is that Biden’s paroles were not valid paroles because they were not granted on a case by case basis. Therefore, there is no legal basis for these people to be in the US because they do not have valid paroles.
2 Likes
One hopes. When final authority is held by an oligarchy of a few judges, we rely on their whims.
Has she issued the text of her order yet?
I have to reserve judgement on this one until I hear her rationale, and the laws/statutes she states to back it up, that “Noem has to have a rationale for canceling parole” and/or that each person has to have a separate case made to get their parole canceled.
In principle I agree with you that a program established by a Presidential EO can be terminated by a Presidential EO.
But I don’t know the relevant statutes governing wither Biden’s or Trump’s EO (remember EOs don’t spring up in a vacuum (usually)- they have to have a legal rationale attached.
