So are black and what. More so even.
one word! 
Imma need ya to start calling me “transbrutha”
1 Like
I don’t follow were you are going with this…
To recap… my main premise is… Suburban moms do not see trans competing on TV (NCAA women’s basketball for example) nor do they see them in their kids schools.
That’s is likely why the issue doesn’t move the needle for them.
Ok. If you say so.
Watch ya girl Catlin Clark next weekend in the NCAA tournament… you won’t see a single trans competing. If they are so dominant… why is there going to be zero representation in that tournament? 60+ of the most elite teams… 700 athletes! No trans?
Weird
2 Likes
These days I don’t think so. Being a Boomer I don’t think this bull ■■■■ would fly when our daughters were in high school or college. For starters, the girls would likely kick the ass of some idiot claiming to “identity” as a female to compete with the girls for some warped advantage? If the mom’s didn’t take exception by strongly protesting and calling for some administrator’s head, Dad’s ( and yes including moi), would probably be getting arrested for threatening to hurt someone.
Parents just have to get involved and make the well being of their kids priority one. Too many gelded fathers and passive mothers IMHO.
5 Likes
Not fear of being publicly shamed?
Cool. 
Then my work here is done. For now.
It’s because athletes at that level would kick the ass of a psycho moron with an identity disorder who can’t cut it with his own gender and feels the need to dominate girls.
But they are physically stronger… they should dominate. Yet, none at the top 100 NCAA basketball programs?
I was interested to what the olympics stance would be. And based on the article i posted, the olympics will not be allowing trannys to compete. That is a pleasant surprise. I dont think for one moment this will be the end of this nightmare. Critprogs will not rest until trannys can dominate womens sports. After all we are talking about sore loser beta men who feel more competitive in the womens class.
5 Likes
[quote=“PurpnGold, post:192, topic:244650”]
But they are physically stronger
[/quote] beg to differ
You keep posting the reason why.
Back to the thread title.
Biden is an ■■■■■■■
The voters need to veto him in nov.
1 Like
as much as I disagree with trans women competing in women’s sports and vice versa, I don’t need the federal government making laws about it. It’s up to the leagues and competitions. Federal gov’t should stay out of it.
Mmmmm. I would normally agree.
Perhaps, but the camel’s nose is under the tent. The time to do something to stop it from coming inside is now, not after it’s in.
Better yet, you could be a twofer … a “transsista.” 
Yes … and that non-interference should work both ways. The Congress should neither force any sports organization (at any level) to accept or prohibit trans women and men from competing on women’s or men’s teams respectively.