Do you think the shop owner financially benefitted? What was in this for him? He would have to financially benefit for this to be as you implied…so…is that your belief?
People do things all the time for no financial benefit.
He may be a true believer.
lol… thats sad. no, not one witness, anybody who received or sent an email. the money trail ius why laundering is part of the investigation. we’ll see when/if it goes to trial
1 Like
none for colluding with russia, or for any campaign violation connected to any collusion with russia
1 Like
The NYT article that no one read points to if the DOJ cannot bring a charge for a FARA violation which is what they are going after… then the money laundering charge also goes away.
If Hunter Biden gets locked up for life… no sweat off my back.
I just think that the soggy laptop being the most important thing in the universe to be funny after ignoring everything from the former guy.
Yet… no one read either report.
It is quite a shame.
i don’t think i’ll take my legal cues from the times.
the fara violation is a slam dunk if the people in the state department he talked to tell the truth. thats a big if. they may have document evidence, but they’ll need a witness to explain it.
money laundering has not one thing to do with fara, wishful thinking on the times part. they have money from ukraine/russian mobsters going through three stops to land in hunters accounts. fara ain’t got ■■■■ to do with that
everybody read them, nobody gives a rats ass about the few statements cherry picked for the narrative you seem to think the reports are all about that actually mean nothing.
1 Like
I get it.
No one cared that they were eyeballs deep in Russian intelligence
Nothing is going to happen to Hunter Biden because it looks like they don’t have a case against him.
nobody cares about the lie the masters fed you.
1 Like
It’s always funny to read something funny like you just typed.
It has a very CHECKMATE LIB!!! vibe to it.
1 Like
should i rate this prediction as high as your predictions about durham being done after sussman?
yeah, i think so
1 Like
We will find out about how well Durham does with Sussman in a couple of months.
If that get thrown out… Durham is done.
actually, your prediction was not about sussman, you said he was done after wizeman (or whatever his name was)
already tried. denied
Nope. Never said that.
The trial is in May if I remember correctly.
the motion to dismiss was denied.
I know… which is why I said the trial is in may… if I remember correctly.
