Ruling them with absolute force appears to be the best solution, when dealing with those who commit acts of unprovoked violence.
They weren’t defeated, they changed tactics. If you hadn’t noticed they’re still fighting, they still have thousands of men and hundreds of millions in reserves.
Defeated my ass.
They were on the run, now they’re not.
So Germany was just on the run after WW1?
1 Like
The kids who’ll glow green in the dark maybe.
And the Iranians, of course.
Where would you like us to run them to?
You mean after Germany signed it’s surrender?
So kill our kids now?
Why would I care about Iran?
As long as they’re on the defensive it doesn’t matter as much, does it?
Do you believe ignoring them is the preferable option?
You asked who cares.
So perpetual war. I like it!
Ok. Who currently rules over them?
yes, why does a piece of paper matter? Obviously didn’t mean anything.
It is hard to surrender when you have no government to surrender.
You’ve been at perpetual war for a while now.
Again, is ignoring them really the better option? Not a good option, the better one.
I always thought we should have stayed out of that one.
Did the Germans stop the invasion and killing of their neighbours? Yes, because they surrendered.
ISIS never surrendered and was never defeated. It was losing, badly. Now it’s not.
Today…no one. Hey George…thank you for ■■■■■■■ this whole thing up under the guise of WMDs. Dick and Halliburton say thank you.
Regardless of who ■■■■ on the carpet, someone still has to clean it up.
So to reiterate the OP, what next?
So your premise is because they didn’t completely go into hiding and then rebuild they were not defeated? We will just have to disagree.
Between this and Kim’s ‘Christmas surprise’, I’m feeling discouraged about world peace.
At least the real killers of Khashoggi got the death sentence. 
Ok, let’s say they were defeated. ISIS was obliterated, good job Trump!
Now what?
