Is Fox News censoring Hannity?

FOX News and FBN Block Attorney Matthew Deperno From Appearing on Hannity and Lou Dobbs

Perhaps the attorney will appear on the Hannity radio show, but it looks like Fox is attempting to bury the story.

Do we have a state-controlled media?

Of course “state” refers to the Peoples Republic of China. For background see:

1 Like

Murdoch has two sons and both are extremely liberal but one…even more so. In March, Rupert turned over Fox. In July, the second son resigned from the board because there were too many conservative articles that goes against the narrative he wants to push.

Notice the article that announces the change, begins with “Fox wanted to play down the virus”. This is the NYT peddling their liberal garbage and paving the way for this son to make changes at Fox.

“My resignation is due to disagreements over certain editorial content published by the Company’s news outlets and certain other strategic decisions,” James Murdoch wrote Friday in a brief letter to News Corp’s board that the company made public. The resignation was effective Friday.

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2020/07/31/rupert-murdochs-son-quits-over-right-wing-news-tilt/24578981/

These two are shepherds, attempting to sheoplize their listeners by only putting on the air, what they want you to hear. The problem is, Fox viewers are leaving as a result. Which do the boyz love more…what they want to propagate or money?

The actual revenue from the news channels is small compared to their value as informercials to influence public opinion.

That is true for any news outlet owned by a huge multinational corporation. That includes Fox News and the rest of the mainstream news and social media.

The business model may be influenced more by maintaining access to the China market and other business considerations than by advertising revenue and audience size.

1 Like

This is what brought the businessmen to support the Bolsheviks in the Russian Revolution. They fell for the promise of bigger international markets. You know the phrase “workers of the WORLD unite”. The Bolsheviks had in mind what would be called NWO today. The businessmen eventually discovered that somewhere in the small print, they gave away control to the state. And any backtalk and they would be fuel for the fires of the leftist debacle.

Let them fight…

Fox is swinging more and more that direction which is why many of us are going more and more to OAN and Newsmax for news these days.

I still like Hannity, Carlson, and Dobbs but even these honorable men will be hamstrung if the network begins censuring them.

Allowing people like Donna Brazille on board was a drastic negative sign.

2 Likes
Moderator Note

@JayJay you’re trolling. Stop.

Fox news is censoring…period. At 1:30 seconds Marie Harf, ( Marie Elizabeth Harf (born June 15, 1981) is a liberal political commentator for the Fox News Channel[1] and former deputy campaign manager for policy and communications for the Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) presidential campaign. She served as the Senior advisor of Strategic Communications to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry at the United States Department of State, leading the Iran nuclear negotiations communications strategy. Harf also was Acting Spokesperson and Deputy Spokesperson of the State Department.) enters the screen and is telling the hosts to shut the former Speaker of the House…Newt Gingrich… down.

Yes, there’s no question Fox is censoring now.

1 Like

After the colluding conspirators are rounded up and censured and charged, suddenly things will change.

America is not asleep anymore.

As I see it, Fox News is trying to clean up their act. They paid (maybe a lot) over the conspiracy theory about Seth Rich. Then recently they scrambled to make a video about the voting software to prevent lawsuits.
If you read other reports (then the Gateway Pundit) some of the facts in this new report are being challenged by the folks that were in charge of the election there. And they say that there is no evidence of foul play.
One election official also said that if the Trump campaign felt that the count was not accurate they could have requested a hand count. They didn’t.
Can’t everyone agree that conspiracy theories and inaccurate investigations should not be broadcast by a news network until they are verified?

1 Like

Are we back to round ups and mass arrests again?

1 Like

If you are suggesting that Fox’s perspective is changing because of money…
You will find little argument here. We already know that.

The any day now stuff will not end soon. The crime in search of evidence will stay with these folks for a very long time.

Lol yeah Lachlan Murdoch is soooo liberal.

And James is totally involved in running Fox News.

They’re scared of lawsuits. It’s pretty obvious.

1 Like

Can’t remember you saying all this during the russia, russia, russia clown show and the leftist media putting out unverified leaks as fact.

1 Like

I’m not sure we ever left them in this particular fever dream.

Amazing how so many so-called “patriots” are all for martial law and jailing of political rivals.

The left taught us well with their we believe there was a crime so now we need to have an investigation to find the evidence we believe is there.
We heard smoking gun any day now we will have our proof an trump will be arrested.
How long did this go on? That’s right over 2 years and a big fat nothing.
But the leftist media was not going to give up there had to be something the leftist media and the liars they elected were telling their voters there had to be something.
Let’s go for impeachment and drag in more people and have secret meetings and leak stuff to keep the lie going because there has to be something. We have him now. Any day he is going to drug out of the white house in hand cuffs.

Some of the reports were not checked out. I never said that they were valid. And the difference is that the Mueller report and the Senate investigation both confirmed that there was collusion. Just because it wasn’t prosecuted seems to make Trump supporters make the claim that there was no collusion. Which is false. If the election fraud argument is valid then there will be evidence.

See you still can’t admit that the mueller report was a big nothing. It’s sad to see people who have been proven wrong continue to cling to lies.

3 Likes