Women actually have more freedom (socially) then men. Men are expected to work, to build careers, to support their families. Women can do whatever they want regardless of having children.
And itās not just waitressing or secretarial work. More than half of the engineers where I worked are now women. All of the doctors I see are women except for my urologist and he has a woman PA. Even our two vets (one for the dog, one for the cats) are women. Half the time I fly, one of the two pilots are women.
Yes, and those days are gone, since the govt has the idea you shouldnāt be allowed to do those things.
Drive an old(er) car? Nope, Cash for Clunkers get those off the road to make way for those electric cars they want to force you to buy at some point.
Grow your own good? gasp! Canāt have that. Especially if you plan to irrigate with a rainwater catchment system. The govt owns that water dammit. Homesteading and self sufficiency is now āfar rightā and up there with terroristic tendencies.
The govt is working hard to make you dependent on them and them alone, and the perpetually stupid follow along and spout the approved lines. Cow farts!!! Eat the insects!
The days of the govt promoting self sufficiency ala victory gardens etc. are long gone my friend.
He wasnāt wrong. He was pointing out how the Democrats had failed the rural Midwest. Instead of working for them, they worked against them by pushing the Neo-Liberal pro business agenda that the right seized on by making them blame immigrants and the āotherā instead of the people who pulled the factories out of their towns.
The thing is that Obama turned out to be the exact same sort of Neo-Liberal that the two previous administrations were makes the entire thing worse.
The bitter clinger was a lamentā¦ not an accusation.
Oh noā¦ how dare he point out that even someone that he cares for deeply is still a flawed human and has prejudices. The horror.
Manā¦ when did the typical white person become so thinned skinned?
Yeah. That is a kill your radio one.
That speech was an economic one. He was doing the Wall Street v Main Street thing.
In the end Wall Street won.
It was a speechā¦ but he wasnāt wagging his fingerā¦ he was talking about economic opportunity for the middle class in the face of a cratering economy.
This is the problem when it comes to Obamaā¦ all of his words for some reason carry the worst connotation for the right but letās say when a candidate says that he will be a day one dictatorā¦ no big deal.
And like 1865 it is apparently only one sides fault.
Is the suggestion here that we go back to a time before progressive policies? Where do we draw the line? Back to pre civil rights? Womanās suffrage? The gays?
Are you new? Discrimination against women in favor of men in hiring or promotion is illegal. Discrimination against men in favor of hiring or promoting women is not. The term they use to justify the former is āunderutilized.ā
The disenfranchisement was in the dismissal. They could come along for the ride, but they had to sit in the back and keep their mouths shut. Fundamental change requires compliance of the masses whether they want to change or not.
You over-estimate your enemies. Beckās influence is very limited (and made fun of even by conservatives.) And he while he may espouse much of the same philosophy if the Birchers, he isnāt one.
