You’re right that Trump has been left with no good decision out of his own rash impulsiveness to assassinate Soleimani. He should be blamed for making a terrible choice.
Even Dem politicians pretend to respect the military. You’ll only find keyboard libs using terms like invaders, or insinuating that they want to see us somehow driven out by inbred armies in ratty equipment. There’s a lot to enjoy with that kind of flailing.
Now, about that reimbursement cost for their right to self-govern that they’re going to pay. A million per veteran shouldn’t exceed more than 3 trillion, so lets say 100k for everyone deployed, 250k for combat badge recipients (+50k if it’s a CIB or CMB), 500k for purple heart recipients, and a cool one million for the families of the fallen. Throw in a few trillion more for the cost of handing them a fair chance. Sound fair? It’s the least those inbred morons could do for our hard work.
We have already established that Obama reintroduced troops. He did it so that Russia wouldn’t gain control of Iraq. You can argue whether or not it was needed. But Iraq had no problem with us there… until today.
Today they asked us to leave… but Trump doesn’t want to leave. So it seems he agrees with Obama. Right?
No lib has said they want to see anything like that. We are asking what cons think Trump should do? Keep them there against the request of Iraq… or pull them out?
If they don’t want us there… why would we continue to stay?
suggesting that not staying In Iraq when the host nation of Iraq doesn’t want you there and has rescinded legal immunity for your troops is clearly siding with the enemy.