You said there is a middle class in Iran just waiting to burst with the yearn for a liberal democracy. I said it will never happen because Khameini won’t allow it to happen.
It’s strange to me that you read ‘I wouldn’t do that’ as a failure to deny doing it.
No, you should scroll up. And work on your mnemonics, while you’re at it.
My bad. I leapt to the assumption that you were comparing America’s turbulent history with that of Iran. I apologize.
Fair.
Wow now we are getting personal! How am I not shocked? You are making typos as well, but syntax isn’t what we are arguing here.
Oh, lady irony is getting her gilded offering now.
I’m not the one acting like the grammar police.
Are you ready to concede the CIA never funded Baluchi terrorists, given that I can’t find a single reference to Baluchi terrorists with any google search, let alone CIA funding of those terrorists?
He made a typo on the name, but blasts me for typos.
Actually, I said that, and why not? Modern Iran was born of revolution
It’s always been born of a revolution it’s a cycle without end. Eventually we will back the wrong horse in the race.
I know that! 
I was waiting for him to clear it up. But even with Balochis they aren’t terrorists and while the CIA backed their efforts against the Iranian regime, they never funded terrorist activity.
Your Google must be broken.
1 Like
So where’s your link? 
Yeah calling them terrorist is a stretch, but they were doing shady stuff.
Not a typo. A difference of anglicisation.
1 Like
Yes, but they weren’t firing rockets at innocent civilians, nor were they blowing themselves up in a crowded market place.
Really what’s a respinse? Didn’t he mean response?
I still think it was a typo, but in any case still no mention of CIA funding of terrorist activity.
