Asking again are you a woman who had to fight to get the right to even have woman sports?
Are all those men such snowflakes that they can’t compete against their own sex?
Are all those fake women lives going to be ruined forever because they have to compete against the sex they were born as.
You leftist have show woman that you really never cared about us.
More than 300 current and former NCAA, Team USA and international swimmers and divers signed on to an open letter sent to the NCAA on Thursday in support of Lia Thomas, an openly transgender swimmer competing on Penn’s women’s team.
…and yet 100% of the females in sports have been impacted by less than this 2%. Are you starting to question why we’d sacrifice the 100% for the very few? It doesn’t make sense. Hopefully…you’re catching on?
I love how the media is portraying it you can see the sides line up “Controversial legislation”. Up until a few years ago and the last 1000 years at least boys competing with boys and girls competency with girls in sports was not considered controversial.
What would be considered controversial a few years ago would be a man saying he’s a woman step into and mma match and knock a girl out.
Social media users have been sharing posts online which claim that Dr Rachel Levine, former Secretary of Health for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and now President Joe Biden’s new assistant health secretary, believes children should be allowed to have gender reassignment surgery without parental consent. There is no evidence to support this claim.
Is anyone willing to agree in connection with the sports debate that there is a difference between a person who matures as a male and then transitions, and a person who has male body parts but who never develops as a male because of puberty blockers and then develops as a female because of hormone therapy? It would seem to me that these two situations should be treated differently. One would (at least until a period of hormone therapy has passed, and maybe not even then) have a physical advantage, while the second would not. Why must there be such a blunt instrument approach as the Iowa law?
Also, it is not at all unlikely that Iowan athletes may be prohibited from competitions that are interstate and therefore subject to associational rules that prohibit this sort of ban. What to do then?