I don’t see the problem that Idaho apparently sees.
Each governing entity that gets $$ from the lottery can do what it wants with its share. I don’t see why Idaho cares what Australia does with its share. (And it seems to me that the concerns Idaho has about what Australia might do with its share would actually be more likely to happen in California or Massachusetts. Why hasn’t Idaho voiced concern about that?)
I just don’t see their point.
And DESPITE the typo in the thread title, I agree with the title’s sentiments.
If foreign countries are allowed in (Canada has been), it’s not a US lottery.
And this move isn’t going to prevent Powerball from letting Australia in. You think MUSL cares that Idaho is dropping out? Sydney alone has 5x the population of the entire state.
I do share their concerns that MUSL could let countries like China in, but a) that’s highly unlikely, I think and b) Idaho’s methods on how to affect change is silly. As another poster pointed out, liberal states likely put their share of the profits to uses Idaho doesn’t like.
Neither did I. I wasn’t addressing that part of your response…I was addressing the part where you incorrectly identified Powerball as a “US lottery”…so your response back to me was a non sequitur.
Hence my next response “Umm…okay”.
This a lot of effort on your part to avoid admitting your erroneous identification of Powerball as a “US lottery”.
The Powerball was, despite being a tax on desperation (because only the lucky get ahead) or those bad at math, still among the few things in Oz not trying to kill people