No, he couldn’t have.
The region he was allegedly born in. Early depictions of him were brown with “wool” like hair. He got whiter and whiter from the 4th century on. He wouldn’t have looked like Jared Leto.
It’s made up… don’t hurt your head over that question
Night and day, but mostly authoritarianism.
I don’t agree with some of it, but this is pretty good:
Stop it. I can’t believe what I just read.
Not hardly.
Good news everyone. The President is on the case.
1 Like
You are off topic and spamming/trolling. Please stop.
1 Like
We are still on this dumb timeline I see.
1 Like
Of course He could. There is nothing He can’t do. He could appear as each person needed Him to.
Believe it!
The country being divided thanks to the help of the Obama Administration Russian collusion lie should of been a qlue.
And he was always white? No one needed him to be black/brown? In the Middle East? 
You aren’t paying attention. Is He always depicted as white?
Except for some of the earliest depictions. Remember there weren’t any pictures of him painted while he was alive. The earliest was almost 200 years after his death.
Really more of a Kenny Loggins vibe.
Is it safe to say the biggest difference is the belief in private property? At least according to that article? I don’t see many people who are advocating taking away people’s property.
I think we all just got a really awkward look inside your brain.
You are the one drawing the distinction of time as an arbiter of when it is ok to bring statues down. Now that I used the Lenin statue being pulled down 80 years after Lenin, you don’t want to talk about it because it makes your logic look inconsistent.
2 Likes
Oh no, that is very incorrect. He is most definitely not always depicted as white.
It’s a little more safe to say the only difference is the hackneyed partisan one generally only pointed out by a few at this forum.
A statue in a town square is placed to bestow honor on the person depicted.
Not all books are written to honor the subjects of the manuscript.
