Why not both?
Ok, not equally though.
1 Like
Yes i agree that it was more about ussr.
1 Like
He’s up there for me. I mean he ■■■■■■ up a bit he also became president and had to design the postwar order with literally no idea what FDR was even trying to accomplish (FDR never told anyone anything except Harry Hopkins sometimes) or that the Manhattan Project even existed. Also the only president who didn’t attend college. He was a haberdasher.
Winning re-election when there were three Democratic candidates running against one Republican is probably the most impressive electoral victory ever.
I would be like Stephen Douglass winning in 1860.
Allan
Mr Allan, the movie is not over yet. Wait for the ending.
Asians were expendable to teach the Russians a lesson?
Actually that has been a problem for colonialist western countries.
North South Vietnam conflict started because the colonialist gave Vietnam back to the French after World War II. All the Vietnamese wanted was to be free. It took about 30 years after WW II to achieve it.
Were you there or are you going to ponder theories today?
Not Asians, Japanese. Who did what they did prior. And two cities, not the whole country.
Yes.
It had to be proven to work for it to be a deterrent.
I figured you would adore Truman and not see a problem about Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Extreme oversimplification
We can agree to disagree about Asia.
Now we got a made to order Putin to hate. Let’s keep our eyes on China Iran and DPRK now
We can agree to disagree… I must be a victim of the KISS theory of relativity.
We can agree you’re wrong. We didn’t drop two bombs on “Asia”.
Yest it was Japan. But it was the colonialist opinion the the Yellow race was more expendable . @WuWei this is very complicated and there is a lot of dirt to turn over.
The root cause of hypocrisy of wokism.
Today we can all hate Putin. Who we gonna hate tomorrow. A couple of the left sided started it by photos of Japanese soldier on bicycles and saying some right wing person would bring up the abomb drop.
I am not sure some will want to discuss the ugly truth of mankind.
I understand what you are saying and respect your comments. Every once in a while we can agree to disagree
While we rebuilt “Asia”. Forgetting what Japan did to “Asia”?
1 Like
There was money to be made. Who is making money on the Ukraine Russian conflict?
Have a nice day.
And you as well.
EU and most of the World Order look at President Zelenskyy as a symbol of Ukraine’s resilience and determination to fight for its sovereignty and against Russia expansionism. I agree with that.
I want to know how come in 1945 the World Order did not support Ho Chi Minh in his determination to fight for his country’s sovereinty and then the World Order reestablished French Colonialism to that South East Asian country. The supporting Colonialists hashed out that French Colonialism trumpted over Vietnam freedom.
I undertand the Ukraine issue against Russia. What I do not understand it the World Order’s deaf ears on Ho Chi Minh’s desire to tell the world of his struggle against imperial power for liberty and independence was part of a long-standing history of democratic aspirations.
