If Global Warming Is Real, Then Why......?

[conan]

I like that. Climate terrorist.

Good name for em.

[WuWei]

@conan

I like that. Climate terrorist.

Good name for em.

Terrorizing children.

[gooddad409]

@wayoutwest

The irony escapes you, huh? Let me help:

You posted pictures in an attempt to refute global warming. Unfortunately, the pier you posted was destroyed in 2004 by a hurricane, and subsequently rebuilt 5 feet higher to be more resistant to higher storm surges. So, it was destroyed by one of the predicted consequences of AGW.

That’s why it’s funny…

What’s funny is the way some folks are tap dancing around all the failed predictions over the years and pretending like they didn’t happen.

[wayoutwest]

Nice. Can’t formulate an argument, so let’s just call them all terrorists.

[conan]

Are you telling me that isn’t the same pavilion?

[conan]

Here is my original post on this matter to Medicwife.

50 years of fake news on the Climate apocalypse

The water under the pier near the pavilion is exactly the same as it was back in late 70’s. https://www.google.com/maps/uv?hl=en&pb=!1s0x88d8d9c76cefa98b%3A0x125d02ae8b6f146b!2m22!2m2!1i80!2i80!3m1!2i20!16m16!1b1!2m2!1m1!1e1!2m2!1m1!1e3!2m2!1m1!1e5!2m2!1m1!1e4!2m2!1m1!1e6!3m1!7e115!4shttps%3A%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipMmBXixuiWwIBAM5oyUCJyCAEFTWc1GmS6tK0St%3Dw370-h208-k-no!5slake%20worth%20florida%20pier%20-%20Google%20Search!15sCAQ&imagekey=!1e10!2sAF1QipMmBXixuiWwIBAM5oyUCJyC…

[westaussie]

And let me post the 2019 Pacific Island Forum Communique (13th - 16th August, 2019):

50th-Pacific-Islands-Forum-Communique.pdf

[gooddad409]

@wayoutwest

No, that’s been adequately addressed over in cratics post from the other day. Pretty sure you participated, so you should know exactly which one Im referring to.

There’s no excuse for all the failed scary predictions going back 50 years.

The credibility of the left wing so called scientists is shot at this point.

[conan]

Pictures or it hasn’t happen. No theories. We seen and heard your theories before.

[westaussie]

Your post is absolutely hilarious.

They actually live there. It is their lived experience. It is quite breathtaking that you presume to know better than the people who live on these islands.

[wayoutwest]

Again, this is addressed in Cratics other thread.

You’ve been quite clear that you do not believe in AGW because you believe all things will happen at the will of God. That’s fine. But we’re having a discussion about science, and if that’s your position, Im not attempting to make any attempt to sway your opinion.

[westaussie]

As opposed to the lived experience 24 hours a day, 365 or 366 days of the year of Pacific Islanders’ lives on their islands. I mean who would be the more well informed?

[amadeus]

Science guy scary.

[thinkingman]

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

are you serious about Miami disappearing in a few years? certain socialist politicians sure are. i’d love to see the science behind that

I highly doubt that is being taught in class. Likely they stick to the science of global warming.

i hope so because if so they will learn how intertwined with politics it is, and that other scientists have different conclusions

Yes, a minority of scientists have different conclusions. Should schools teach the majority or minority opinion? You’ll probably say both but we don’t do that for most science. Perhaps in college it would be appropriate.

they should teach that on subjects so miserably complex and variable the science is not “in” and is a long way from it

[amadeus]

@wayoutwest

Apparently now terrorists. Does this mean I have to get a new wardrobe?

Maybe a lab coat?

[STODR]

Exactly, hard to believe he is a scientist if he doesn’t know the difference between the two.

[thinkingman]

@Borgia_dude

@thinkingman

@noSpaces

The ocean rise is a big deal. Majority of civilization is near the coast and thus are the centers of trade and economy. Imagine the seaports, airports and such being underwater. Then just imagine all the pollution thrust into the ocean due to the coastal inundation. The oceans are severely altered and gone.

This is the thing that strikes me the most in these climate threads. We have this sort of argument now that the climate changes and somehow it’s awesome no big deal but that perception is due to a complete lack of imagination of what the changes entail.

with some variability, sea levels have been rising since last ice age, and reportedly not any faster than in early to mid 1900’s

Can you source this claim? Here is a graph that contradicts it.

https://insideclimatenews.org/sites/default/files/styles/colorbox_full/public/Sea-Level-Rise-Fever-529px.png?itok=Kq6SjG6F

the graph does not contradict that claim as the graph only goes back to 1993

go watch wolf

[thinkingman]

@Jezcoe

@thinkingman

@Jezcoe

So how much are sea levels expected to rise by 2100?

acc to whom?

Looking at the evidence… what do you think that the sea rise will be and what are your sources?

shifting the question now

see these are the ■■■■■■■■ games that are played

you wont answer since there many answers to that across many sources

green new deal

[westaussie]

Let me invite you to read the 50th Pacific Islands Forum communique and for ease I have posted the link below:

50th-Pacific-Islands-Forum-Communique.pdf

[amadeus]

I think you have been more than reasonable, and nobody you have asked has gone back to study the thread, which again seems reasonable enough. Brought to you by the department of redundancy department.