Under a temper tantrum by Lindsay Graham at the hearing.
gooddad409:Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Are you going to pull out the same old tripe where you claim Clinton was up 45 points two days before the election?
Then ignore that most polling was accurate the night of the election?
Should i call you Pete or Repeat?
Under a temper tantrum by Lindsay Graham at the hearing.
My how soon we forget.
I llok forward to wolf blitzer calling biden, et al. “chickens” for refusing to face questions over this.
Any…day…now.
Just…you…wait.
NuffSaid: gooddad409:Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Are you going to pull out the same old tripe where you claim Clinton was up 45 points two days before the election?
Then ignore that most polling was accurate the night of the election?Should i call you Pete or Repeat?
Repeat - Cause its been repeated 50,000 times about polling and how the CEC ignores what polling represents.
The guys on your side saw no path for Trump last time either. There were a lot of arrogant boasting coming from the left as late as 9 o’clock election night even.
Things started getting a bit somber at that point as reality set in.
It really has never been pointed out how the networks all knew it was over right around 9:00, but held off calling it so hillary could run up the popular vote count on the lib coast.
If they called those states when they knew the outcome, trump would have won the popular vote as well.
H_Arendt:Under a temper tantrum by Lindsay Graham at the hearing.
My how soon we forget.
Selective forgetting, of course. Democrats are hoping Maine voters remember Susan Collins’ statement that Kavanaugh told her he would respect settled law, all the more so in light of his dissent last week in which he laid out more than a dozen reasons why he felt unconstrained to stick to what he committed to Collins.
gooddad409: NuffSaid: gooddad409:Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Are you going to pull out the same old tripe where you claim Clinton was up 45 points two days before the election?
Then ignore that most polling was accurate the night of the election?Should i call you Pete or Repeat?
Repeat - Cause its been repeated 50,000 times about polling and how the CEC ignores what polling represents.
Repeat it is. You didn’t learn from 2016 and appear doomed for a repeat of history.
NuffSaid: gooddad409: NuffSaid: gooddad409:Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Are you going to pull out the same old tripe where you claim Clinton was up 45 points two days before the election?
Then ignore that most polling was accurate the night of the election?Should i call you Pete or Repeat?
Repeat - Cause its been repeated 50,000 times about polling and how the CEC ignores what polling represents.
Repeat it is. You didn’t learn from 2016 and appear doomed for a repeat of history.
We’ll see in November. Either Biden becomes the 46th President or Trump will have a second term.
gooddad409: NuffSaid: gooddad409: NuffSaid: gooddad409:Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Are you going to pull out the same old tripe where you claim Clinton was up 45 points two days before the election?
Then ignore that most polling was accurate the night of the election?Should i call you Pete or Repeat?
Repeat - Cause its been repeated 50,000 times about polling and how the CEC ignores what polling represents.
Repeat it is. You didn’t learn from 2016 and appear doomed for a repeat of history.
We’ll see in November. Either Biden becomes the 46th President or Trump will have a second term.
We will indeed. Likely the latter.
The Larry King call.
The Larry King call.
So your rule is if the mother of a person who claims they were assaulted made a call to Larry King, that person is credible, otherwise not.
By your argument, none of Clinton’s accusers were telling the truth.
Tara Trade has been consistent and compelling.
Now we have evidence.
Why the presumption on my opinion?
The King call is compelling. Do you dismiss it?
Lot more then Ford had…
Anything is more than nothing.
Reade clearly knew Biden.
Now those around them know the story is out.
Why the presumption on my opinion?
The King call is compelling. Do you dismiss it?
I asked what was the criteria for determining credibility. You said it was the King call. I merely extrapolated from your statement. If your criteria is evidence that the alleged victim reached out to others at the time, then both Donald Trump and Joe Biden should resign. I’m perfectly good with that. Are you?
If they called those states when they knew the outcome, trump would have won the popular vote as well.
That is the first that I heard of this. And I don’t believe this since Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million.
ohknow35:If they called those states when they knew the outcome, trump would have won the popular vote as well.
That is the first that I heard of this. And I don’t believe this since Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million.
In California
Tara Trade has been consistent and compelling.
Now we have evidence.
Her problem is she has been very inconsistent. What dis the phone call say that put a fork in this case?