Trump is the swamp.
2 Likes
Unless he’s the real Teflon Don, I think he’ll get affected, too. And a few close to him.
But according to Rudy Giuliani in an interview with Charlie Rose in, I think, '95, he can be subpoenaed. A little different something than he’s saying now.
Where can I subscribe to your Qanon news letters?
The possibilities are limited only by Donald’s mendacity and his capacity for self-sabotage.
In other words, boundless.
You’re posting images from a schtizo message board we can’t even link to here as if it means something and you’re accusing others of being brainwashed. Just wanted to point that fact out.
It seems that’s not a decided issue.
The DOJ has a policy against it. Since the 70s, reaffirmed with Clinton.
Duh
Point out something in that post that is not accurate?
Uh huh…
He’s not even a politician. Get your definition of swamp right.
That’s silly.
Of course he’s a politician.
1 Like
My gut says The Donald will be found guilty of obstruction of Justice and nothing more. For a time that was kind of a pattern.
Politician plays close to the line.
Politician gets investigated.
Politician gets nervous.
Politician covers-up/obstructs/plays semantic gymnastics/commits perjury to hide his behavior.
Behavior turns out to be (barely) legal but politician is found guilty for cover-up.
Only a pinhead lib would “thunk” it!
He won’t be found guilty of anything as long as he is a sitting President and if he was going to be impeached for firing Comey, it would have already happened.
It could happen over something stupid.
E.G.
Bill Clinton rationalized that using verbal gymnastics and twisting words did not constitute perjury if the questions were about sex and the investigation was not, but he was wrong. NVM that there was no underlying crime. He was guilty of perjury.
Similarly
Any number of paid nondisclosure agreements, or denying involvment in such agreements, could constitute obstruction of justice. Could be obstruction even if the disclosure is about
a construction contract,
a casino,
an investment,
labor practices in the once mobbed up NY construction industry, or
a prostitute
and thus100% unrelated to Russian spying allegations.
oh hell. now THAT has to worry Trump voters.
1 Like
Lol.
“Nondisclosure agreements” vs. “my lawyer or other associates paid hush money,”
NYC was mobtown in the 1970s and 80s and The Donald, was involved in construction and casinos and he procured at least one prostitute.
I think his lawyers, (the ones he can keep), are gonna ask for their retainers up front.
There was an underlying crime in the Clinton Caper.
Educate me.
