Could also say 5 to 1, Pukin’ Putin wins the prize and Nuland cries in her beer about the world order.
It is so painful to watch and listen to so many commentators shaking their heads and stumped as to why the Biden administration are making the decisions they are, which all weaken the USA relative to her adversaries.
We have watched the Democrats via media over the last 6 years accusing Trump and his supporters of being compromised by fictitious family or personal ties to Russian businesses and operatives and even of working for Putin as willing traitors against American power.
But conservative pundits are too gentlemanly to come out openly and state the obvious explanation for the measures the Biden administration and globalist-controlled House and Senate have pushed onto Americans since Jan 6 2021: they are compromised by documented family and personal ties to Russian, Chinese and other foreign businesses and operatives, and are working for Xi and Putin as willing traitors against American power.
There is no other rational explanation for the decisions being made and the actions being taken that ALL strengthen China’s and Russia’s hands and ALL weaken the US.
The Republicans should be boldly and repeatedly stating this fact every time they are asked to comment on what the Biden admin are doing. What was sauce for the goose…
Prove me wrong.
1 Like
Paul you are a wise forum member. The One Horse Dog Faced Pony Soldier and his ship of fools are pushing us into an uncompromising losing situation.
Nah it makes perfect sense. Your definition of a strong leader is pretty obvious
Leaders have followers. No one follows Harris. No one follows Xiden.
They both entered the Presidential-vice-Presidential ticket believing that the Presidency is merely a high profile status symbol, and policy decision are all made by think tanks of experts, whose plans the President merely signs off on.
They did not expect to have to make the decisions themselves.
Harris and Xiden are weak followers. Who are they following?
1 Like
7 to 1 Pukin’Putin takes the prize.
I wonder if VP Giggles will giggle?
May be. None of this changes the simple fact that what you guys see as strength in the leaders you seek is really more about strongman
You happen to be wrong. Strength is standing up boldly for clearly presented principles espoused when campaigning and not buckling under bullying by media, fellow party members and cancel culture groupies. Trump and De Santis and Youngkin are strong leaders.
3 Likes
Thats some good bumpersticking.
That’s sad.
Dems used to do it, some still are. AOC and her bunch for example. Bernie Sanders maybe.
“Standing up for espoused principles”.
Nebulous vapid nonsense.
It is quite sad you are right.
2 Likes
Yeah, Trump strong leader…There’s a bunch of SDF members in Syria who would disagree. That little thing of when Trump just got annoyed with Turkey and said they can go ahead and attack our allies.
You mean that little thing where he decided that he wasn’t going to war with another NATO country and the Democrat media told us there was going to be a genocide but there wasn’t?
Which network was it that used the explosion from an old stateside military exercise and pretended it was Turks blowing up Kurds? Can’t remember off hand.
Oh yeah, ABC.
4 Likes
What do you stand up for?
Safety nets, some empathy not a lot mind you, right to privacy just to name a few.
Not that punch down victomhood nonsense.
We just did this in the other thread btw. There aren’t any real principles being followed by certain posters just bumper stickers. That’s what that post amounted to.
Nebulous vapid nonsense
1 Like
There ya go.
“I stand up for safety nets!”
Means less than nothing.
2 Likes
