That’s EXACTLY what he said.
Read the memo.
Allan
We have already heard from mulveny about the quid pro quo.
Just like him say it under oath.
Allan
So what did he mean by that.
If not a threat.
Allan
That’s what the inquiry is for!
Trump Nation translation: That’s what the Deep State lib mob progressive-socialist-kommanyst-satanic witch hunt is for!
1 Like
Everyone is lying.
Um…because a President throwing shade at a former ambassador is not cool?
Because the word of a President carries weight and can affect the future careers of even former executive branch members?
I think this short video is most damaging…specially concerning Obama administration and Biden crime family.
Except our POTUS
1 Like
Im sure you do.
It’s pretty telling when your own supporters think your strongest line of defense is a quip that doesn’t even address that matter at the heart of the investigation whatsoever, but rather is a grand “whataboutism” about the prior administration.
Expertly done…juxtaposing the original investigation into events that happened years before Hunter Biden sat on Burisma’s board (an investigation that was BLOCKED, btw, by Viktor Shokin, to the degree where the UK had to suspend their case and release back to Burisma some 23 M GBP it had frozen) with Yovanovitch’s 2016 confirmation hearing.
Skipping over all the critical information I stuck in parentheses.
Works very well to fool the people who didn’t have a clue about anything related to the Ukraine until “I Spin 4Chan conspiracies into ‘truth’” John Solomon got a platform from the CEC.
1 Like
Im honestly scratching my head at this line of defense. Primarily for what you’ve stated above, that Hunter wasn’t even part of the company until 2014; the investigation into Burisma only covered up to 2012 and years prior. It makes no sense.
But the Repubs refuse to see that. It’s like simple timelines are too difficult for them to bother with now. This is why I’d love to see Hunter testify and the ensuing ■■■■■■■■■ that unfolds.
It’s not that they don’t refuse to see it.
It’s that by and large, they’re not shown it…deliberately not shown it…on the media they choose to peruse.
Really because I think this was the most damaging.
1 Like
Well he sure as hell is beating the pants off the previous four Presidents and has “managed” the country better in 3 short years then the previous four Presidents did in their combined 28 years. Why is that a hard stretch?
Trillion dollars deficit under full employment, wanting negative interest rates, 5 Homeland secretary in 3 years, Russian flags over us air Base, us troops guarding Syrian oil pumps, 6 close associate admited or convicted of federal crimes another few under federal investigation, dozens of senior federal positions have non permanent, non-senate confirmed “acting” placeholders, dozens more are completely empty, destruction of long standing alliances and trust by intelligence agencies completely shattered, low moral in military, border state , doj…
Yup great manager
1 Like
What does that have to do with trump withholding aid from Ukraine?
It’s rehashing of old charges.
Allan
Maybe a prediction? She went through the impeachment enquiry in the basement, and was driven to tears. They tried to do the same to her in the public hearing, without success. She, s dropped her Ukraine class because of the requirements of testifying. Anyone caught up by Democrats into their power plays has to “go through some things”.
Not a threat.
They use different words, which conveys a different tone.
I like the technique though.
Director General of the Foreign Service Carol Perez told Yovanovitch she needed to “come home immediately … on the next plane” because her safety was at risk.
Since Carol was the one who said it, has she been questioned about what she meant?
2 Likes
My impression was that she was told to come home because they couldn’t protect her. I. e. She no longer had diplomatic immunity.