The impeachment hearings are a prime example of this.
3 Likes
The president relayed his misgivings about Yovanovich to Zelensky on July 25th, describing her as ābad news.ā Trump added that āsheās going to go through some things,ā although itās unclear what āthingsā Trump could have been referring to considering Yovanovitch had already been removed from her position. When asked by Congress about the troubling line, Yovanovitch admitted that she was and still is concerned by what the president may have been implying, adding that she still feels threatened. Hereās the excerpt from the transcript released Monday:
Q: At the bottom of that same page, President Trump says, āWell, sheās going to go through some things.ā What did you understand that to mean?
A: I didnāt know what it meant. I was very concerned. I still am.
Q: Did you feel threatened?
A: Yes.
(from the above Rolling Stone article I previously linked to)
Why would Congress allow for her to comment on a complete fiction of @biggestal99ās making?
She read the transcript before Trump released it? Weird.
The direct quote from our beloved POTUS.
āWell, sheās going to go though some thingsā
Lol.
Allan
She said she heard about the call. Did not read the classified transcript.
Allan
More leaks? You donāt say!
1 Like
This is where supporters of the President start to intentionally confuse timing of things so they can make points that exist only in a world where DeLoreans have flux capacitors.
6 Likes
She was advised to leave on the next flight because she was at risk, well before the transcript. This is pretty simple ā ā ā ā ā
1 Like
Noā¦she must be lying.
Is leaking the threat worse than the threat?
There wasnāt a threat. There was a leak to form a narrative within the state department.
Ah good old TDS on full display here. Like the POTUS didnt learn from the mob in the NY real estate business
1 Like
She was told to leave Ukraine for her own safety. Pompeo said he could no longer protect her.
Then she finds out Trump tells Pres Z āsheās going to go through some thingsā¦ā. Not āSheās gone through some thingsā¦ā. No, his statement is foretelling the future.
Now how wouldnāt a rational person interpret that as a threat?
3 Likes
On top of the āgo big or go homeā recommendation to tweet support for the President orā¦
There were mulitple components, long before the release of the transcript partial memo of the call, and even the call itself, that a reasonable person would conclude were threatening.
The release of the memo was validation of the previous.
This is all supporters of the President trying to muddy the timeline to make folks think that the only threatening thing that could be construed was on the call and its memo.
That statement about āgoing through some stuffā was merely a part of the pattern that started much earlier.
1 Like
Not really.
Who are you to say how she should take it? Are you her?
Because itās all a sham! Thatās why
What was wrong?
āWitnessā after āwitnessā is a āformerā this-or-that. Or a disgruntled never-Trumper.
What should ANYONE expect from a queue of such āwitnessesā?
