Really?
I guess we will find out if the following statement is true:
JWK
Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Yes really. FBI wrote an actual letter. Nowhere in it do they confirm they have a laptop, let alone a laptop belonging to Hunter.
None of the images in the foxnews article you linked so any document with Hunters name on it.
The FBI put out their statement. It doesn’t say what you want to believe. Maybe they do. Maybe they don’t. Maybe they have a laptop and it isn’t Hunter’s laptop. Maybe it is. But don’t claim something as fact when it is just feeling.
they don’t have to. we’ve seen the documents admitting it into evidence
Well there is a signed receipt from the service repair shop and a letter from Hunters lawyer requesting the return of their clients laptop, just why would a lawyer representing Hunter do that if it was not his clients property?
No you have not. You have seen pictures of PDF copies of alleged documents with the identifying metadata intentionally excluded so people cannot actual confirm if they are real or not. How is this not sinking in?
Rudy could clear all of this up with releasing the metadata. Why won’t he? Don’t you agree he should?
And your source for Hunter Biden’s attorney admitting that it was HB’s laptop and requesting return is…?
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS
I love how some keep postnig the same article that doesnt say what they think it says -but just keep repeating the title as if that makes it fact.
How about I just keep repeating “the laptop is Russian disinfo!”
and when asked for proof I’ll just keep posting this and highlinging the title. Case closed!
HUNTER BIDEN STORY IS RUSSIAN DISINFO
It’s not true until the FBI says it’s true. 
and you believe if they were fake the fbi wouldn’t step up?
you’re truly grasping here.
Hunter lawyer asked for the laptop back? Where’s the letter and who verified it?
Step up to what? You’ve lost the plot man.
If the FBI has the HD and they have had it for a while, and it is loaded with CP, wouldn’t they have arrested Hunter long ago? That is a serious crime.
And wouldn’t they have also questioned Giuliani, Nunes and other Republicans who also had this drive? And wouldn’t transferring CP to others be a legitimate reason to also indict these fellows?
While this certainly looks like agitprop, they should have never mentioned the FBI or CP, they should have simply played this as a corrupt Hunter making money off his last name. Then, they could have simply refused to release the full contents and still get some traction off of the accusations, which is all they really needed. Accusations.
By making this bigger, they made it not only more unlikely to believe, but also easier to discredit. Especially when you throw the FBI into the mix. They are still stinging from the Comey mishaps of 2016 and they are not going down that rabbit hole again.
talk about lost plots… if the docs were fakes, the fbi would say so
If the Docs were real, the FBI would say so.
no, they wouldn’t
Why in the world would the FBI weigh in on political oppo-smear-campaign garbage 12 days before an election, when the only information provided has been PDF copies of alleged material, without a single bit of confirming metadata included?
Should the FBI have also weighed in on this back in the day?
Lt Tony Bobulinski is talking.
because the fbi is being used in it if its not true.
you’re truly grasping
Why not?
Why do you think the FBI would 100% comment if it was fake but wouldnt comment if its real? How does that make any sense in your head?
